Archive for September, 2009

Doctor Unqualified to Testify Against Nurse in Medical Malpractice Case

Tuesday, September 29th, 2009

medical expert witness Doctor Unqualified to Testify Against Nurse in Medical Malpractice CaseA recent Illinois appellate court case discusses the expert witness requirements in medical malpractice actions.  The holding comes as no surprise to experienced Chicago medical malpractice lawyers:  a doctor is not considered qualified to testify concerning the “standard of care” of a nurse in a medical negligence action.

In the case, Smith v. Pavlovich, M.D., et al.,  No. 5-08-0256 (Ill. App. Ct. 5th Dist., Sep. 10, 2009), a three-year-old girl died at the age of 3 from what was diagnosed as meningitis.  Her mother filed a medical malpractice lawsuit against two doctors and a registered nurse, alleging that the defendants negligently failed to recommend and administer Prevnar, a vaccine which may have prevented the bacterial meningitis from causing her daughter’s death.

Prior to the girl’s death, she was a patient at the Carbondale Clinic on six separate occasions and on each occasion, she was only seen by the defendant nurse.  She never saw either of the defendant doctors.  At trial, the court rejected the attempt of the plaintiff’s medical malpractice attorney to have its expert witness, a doctor, testify as to the standard of care applicable to registered nurses.  The appellate court affirmed.

The court noted the well-established rule that to testify as an expert on the standard of care for a given school of medicine, the expert “must be licensed therein.”  In other words, a practitioner of one school of medicine (i.e. a doctor)  is not qualified to testify as an expert in a medical malpractice action against a practitioner of another school of medicine (i.e. a nurse).  Citing Sullivan v. Edward Hospital, 209 Ill. 2d 100 (Ill. 2004).

The court rejected the plaintiff’s argument that the nurse was acting as a pediatrician with respect to the decadent and that therefore a physician specializing in pediatrics was qualified to testify about the standard of care applicable to the nurse.  Furthermore, the appellate court affirmed the dismissals of the defendant doctors because neither doctor ever examined, treated or even saw the decedent as a patient.

This case stresses the importance of choosing experts wisely in medical malpractice actions, and making sure you have an expert qualified to testify concerning the standard of care applicable to each defendant.  Had the plaintiff’s medical malpractice lawyer retained a registered nurse to testify as an expert witness concerning the defendant nurse’s deviation from the standard of care, a jury would have been able to decide whether the nurse’s malpractice caused the plaintiff’s daughter’s death.

For a free consultation with one of our top Chicago medical malpractice lawyers, call Passen Law Group at (312) 527-4500.

share save 171 16 Doctor Unqualified to Testify Against Nurse in Medical Malpractice Case

NTSB Issues Safety Warning re Audio Frequency Track Circuits

Sunday, September 27th, 2009

rail safety technology 300x165 NTSB Issues Safety Warning re Audio Frequency Track CircuitsLast week, the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) issued a national warning regarding the use of audio frequency track circuits in train control systems. The warning comes as the NTSB continues its investigation into the fatal train collision in Washington, D.C. Metro crash.

Audio frequency track circuits are used to detect and transmit speed commands.  The circuits are composed of two modules that contain a track frequency transmitter and receiver.  The modules mounted on rails inside train control rooms at each station.  The NTSB found that an “unintended signal path was created between track circuit modules that resulted in the associated track relay remaining energized,” meaning that no signal was sent indicating a train was on the track.

Train accidents of any kind often cause catastrophic injuries or death to its passengers. There are specific state and federal laws, such as common carrier laws, that govern train accidents.  An experienced Chicago train accident lawyer has a thorough understanding of both state and federal laws, and can help you recover appropriate damages.

The NTSB recommends that the Federal Transit Authority (FTA) and the Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) require regulators and workers to examine track circuits and work with signal equipment suppliers to resolve any issues that jeopardize the safety of the circuits, and thus the safety of transit passengers.  The NTSB also recommends the development of programs that will ensure train control systems are performing correctly.

Although the NTSB has not completed its investigation of the D.C. Metro crash, hopefully those involved in rail transportation that millions depend on, will heed the warning and immediately address safety glitches the NTSB identified, which could prevent another catastrophic train accident on our nation’s transit or rail system.

To speak with an experienced train crash injury lawyer in Chicago, call Passen Law Group at (312) 527-4500 for a free consultation.  Our attorneys would be happy to answer any questions you may have.

share save 171 16 NTSB Issues Safety Warning re Audio Frequency Track Circuits

Motor Vehicle Crash Avoidance Technology

Friday, September 25th, 2009

crash avoidance technology 300x221 Motor Vehicle Crash Avoidance TechnologyA recent ABC News piece, “New Technology Successful in Reducing Severity of Car Crashes,” offers a glimpse at the future of automobile safety, namely, the promise of crash avoidance technology.  Crash avoidance technology includes electronic features built into an automobile for the purpose of helping drivers avoid auto accidents with pedestrians or other vehicles.

One example of such technology is adaptive headlights.  Such headlights may swerve, or rotate around a bend in a curve, illuminating both the curve and potential hazards, like animals in the road, pedestrians or another vehicle.  Because a common cause of many deadly car accidents is the inability to see a road hazard due to weather or lighting conditions, this technology can certainly save lives.

However, crash avoidance technology will probably not impact the number of car accidents caused by reckless drivers, drunk drivers or faulty vehicles parts.  A top car accident lawyer in Chicago can help you investigate the accident, identify responsible parties and navigate various state and federal laws so you get the compensation you deserve.

According to the latest Fatality Facts released by the Insurance Institute of Highway Safety (IIHS), there were 37,261 deaths due to automobile accidents in 2008. Crash avoidance technology, such as adaptive headlights, blind spot sensors and lane departure warnings, have the potential of cutting down on car accident fatalities. The ABC News story says that 31 percent of car accident fatalities “could be prevented, or have an alternate outcome” if such technology is used in vehicles.

Although crash avoidance technology has the potential to make driving safer for all, such technology is not being used by all car manufacturers — and it will take years for such technology to become prevalent in most cars on our nation’s roadways.  Furthermore, crash avoidance technology will not prevent serious motor vehicle accidents caused by negligent or reckless drivers.  To speak with a Chicago auto accident lawyer regarding your injury, call Passen Law Group at 312-527-4500 for a free consultation.

share save 171 16 Motor Vehicle Crash Avoidance Technology