Archive for February, 2010

Illinois Insurers Encouraged to Comply with 2005 Medical Malpractice Reforms Despite Lebron Decision

Friday, February 26th, 2010

medical malpractice insurance 300x180 Illinois Insurers Encouraged to Comply with 2005 Medical Malpractice Reforms Despite Lebron DecisionOur Chicago personal injury lawyers have already discussed the recent landmark Illinois Supreme Court decision, Lebron v. Gottlieb (Ill. Feb 4, 2010), which held that legislative caps on non-economic damages in medical malpractice cases were unconstitutional.  This decision was a huge victory to those fighting on behalf of individuals and family members of those critically injured or killed each year by preventable medical errors.

Although the Lebron decision was a big win for Chicago medical malpractice attorneys and their clients, the decision also had a negative impact on patient rights — invalidating important medical malpractice regulatory reforms (“the 2005 Reform Laws”).  The Court held that because there was an “inseverability provision” in the Act in which the caps were enacted, the entire Act was invalid based on the unconstitutionality of the damage caps provision.  The Court emphasized that the legislature “remains free to reenact” certain provisions, including the 2005 Reform Laws, if “it deems appropriate.”

On February 20, 2010, the Illinois Department of Insurance issued a press release, which “Encourages Insurers to Comply with 2005 Medical Malpractice Reforms.”  The 2005 Reform Laws imposed changes to the Illinois Insurance Code that improved insurer reporting and transparency requirements and enhanced the Department of Insurance’s rate oversight authority.  In other words, the 2005 Reform Laws are critical to fairness and transparency in the medical malpractice insurance industry.

Since 2005, the Department has observed and documented improvements in the medical malpractice market, including a reduction in medical malpractice premiums, an increase in competition among insurance companies, and entry into Illinois of new insurance companies offering medical malpractice insurance.

Therefore, “given the public interest served by improved stability and affordability of medical malpractice insurance in Illinois, the Department of Insurance requests “continued, voluntary compliance by insurers” with the 2005 Reform Laws, including:

  • Timely responses to request for information necessary to determine how rates are set and the reasonableness of those rates;
  • Provide the Department with the insurer’s base rates and a list of available insurance agents;
  • Provide the Department with additional loss, claims, exposure and expense data as well as company-produced studies of reserves supporting Illinois medical malpractice business and company surplus;
  • Continue offering insureds quarterly premium payment options;
  • Continue offering insureds policies containing deductibles;
  • Continue to submit rate and rule filings to the Department prior to proposed changes;
  • Continue to offer discounts to insureds who agree to participate in risk management practices;
  • Provide the Department with 180 days notice before discontinuing the writing of insurance

Meaningful insurance reform is critical to providing preventing unfair and predatory practices by the medical insurance industry.  Also, the Illinois Department of Insurance must have continued access to this type of information to combat the baseless arguments from insurance lobbyists that medical malpractice litigation has a meaningful impact on medical insurance rates.

For a free consultation with a Chicago personal injury lawyer for Passen Law Group, call us at (312) 527-4500.

share save 171 16 Illinois Insurers Encouraged to Comply with 2005 Medical Malpractice Reforms Despite Lebron Decision

Tort Reform Properlty Remains Out of Health Care Bills

Wednesday, February 24th, 2010

As President Obama and fellow democrats went back to the drawing board once again concerning health care reform, conservatives representing the insurance lobby raised calls for tort reform.  Fortunately for the hundreds of thousands of Americans seriously injured or killed each year by preventable medical errors, our Chicago medical malpractice attorneys are pleased to report that the President, and the Congressional majority, has not backed down from its stance that damage caps in medical malpractice cases have no place in health care reform legislation.

Proponents of tort reform say it will result in huge savings over the long haul. The Congressional Budget Office (CBO), that black hole of information, says savings from tort reform can be anywhere from $41 billion to $54 billion over a ten-year period.  Our Chicago medical malpractice lawyers note that this savings amounts to less than one percent of health care costs, at a time when overall health care costs are expected to increase by $2 trillion (with a “T”) in that same ten-year period.

So, tort reform may save Americans less than 1 percent of health care costs over a 10-year period.  But at what cost?  If doctors and medical providers have capped professional liability exposure, will that reduce the incentive to practice safer medicine?  How many more Americans will die or sustain catastrophic injuries caused by medical negligence as a result of capping liability exposure?  What is the cost in terms of damage to families whose lives have been ruined by preventable medical errors, who will not have the financial means to provide for themselves?

The CBO did not measure this cost.

Tort reform removes the ability for victims of negligence to lead as normal a life as possible while giving insurance companies a free pass to profit off the negligence of doctors, hospitals and other health care professionals.

Each Chicago medical malpractice attorney at Passen Law Group understands the devastating impact that medical malpractice can have on families.  Just as the Illinois Supreme Court recently held that damage caps are unconstitutional, we believe that any similar federal law is also unconstitutional.

There are specific factors that must be met in order to bring a medical malpractice case, and such cases also involve doctors, hospitals and insurance companies. The experienced Chicago injury lawyers of Passen Law have a thorough understanding of the factors, players and statutes of limitation.  We also understand that compensation must cover the costs of living with permanent disability, including past and future medical treatment, lost wages, loss of normal life, disfigurement, and past and future pain and suffering.

For a Free Consultation with a Chicago personal injury lawyer with Passen Law Group, call us at (312) 527-4500.

share save 171 16 Tort Reform Properlty Remains Out of Health Care Bills

Congressman Murtha’s Death Caused By Medical Malpractice?

Monday, February 22nd, 2010

Murtha medical malpractice Congressman Murthas Death Caused By Medical Malpractice?Earlier this month, Rep. John Murtha (D-Pa) died from complications after having his gallbladder removed.  Soon after his death, speculation arose whether Congressman Murtha fell victim to medical negligence.  Our experienced Chicago medical malpractice lawyers discuss this issue below.

Gallbladder surgery is a relatively routine procedure.  Still, as with all surgeries, there is a risk of serious complications, including death.  It is important to distinguish a “bad result” from “malpractice.”  Only injuries caused by a doctor’s deviation from the appropriate standard of medical care is malpractice.

According to several news reports, Congressman Murtha first hospitalized with gallbladder problems in December, and underwent surgery on January 28 at the National Naval Hospital in Bethesda, Md.  He was discharged from the hospital following surgery, but was re-admitted two days later when complications developed.   According to various sources, Murtha’s surgeon inadvertently nicked his intestine while performing the laparoscopic gallbladder procedure.  The nick, or small cut, caused a serious infection to develop, which led to his death.

Congressman Murtha’s death has brought the issue of preventable medical errors back into the limelight as Congress returns to health care reform legislation.  Preventable medical errors, such as wrong-site surgeries, improper medication and delayed diagnosis of cancer, kill an estimated 98,000 people each year.  If you or a loved one has been seriously injured or killed while under the care of a medical professional, and you suspect medical negligence could have played a factor, contact a top-rated Chicago medical malpractice attorney at Passen Law today for a free consultation.

Since Murtha’s death, there has been much debate about whether or not the surgeons should have noticed the cut, taken appropriate steps to repair it, and then administered antibiotics to prevent infection and other complications. In other words, did Murtha die as a result of a preventable medical error?  Mr. Murtha’s family has time to decide whether or not to contact a wrongful death lawyer and pursue a negligence action arising out of his death.  It is possible that, behind the scenes, the insurance companies for the doctors and hospitals involved may be trying to resolve the matter without ever facing a lawsuits.  Such negotiations never become public record.

The death of such a prominent politician after undergoing a routine operation is a stark reminder that improved patient safety must be a key component of health care reform.   For a Free Consultation with an experienced Chicago medical malpractice lawyer at Passen Law Group’s, call us at 312-527-4500.

share save 171 16 Congressman Murthas Death Caused By Medical Malpractice?