Archive for September, 2010

Texting While Driving Continues to Pose Major Road Risk

Wednesday, September 29th, 2010

cell phone use while driving 300x195 Texting While Driving Continues to Pose Major Road RiskA new study released last week, based upon U.S. government data,  confirms what our Chicago wrongful death lawyers have been saying all along:  driving and texting is a recipe for disaster.

The researchers, led by assistant professor Fernando Wilson of the School of Public Health at the University of North Texas Health Science Center at Fort Worth, looked at data spanning nearly the last decade.  The results were published in the American Journal of Public Health.  The researchers looked at data from the National Center for Statistics and Analysis’s Fatality Analysis Reporting System, comprehensive a agency which records all deaths occurring on public roads in the United States.

What they found was staggering.  From 2001 to 2007, more than 16,000 people were killed in accidents involving a texting driver.

And the number of distracted driving deaths is only increasing.  In 2007, accidents involving cell phone use or texting resulted in 4,572 deaths.  In 2008, such behaviors resulted in 5,870 deaths.  The nearly 1,300 additional deaths represent an increase of 28%, or almost one-third again as many deaths.  The researchers stated that this increase was caused almost entirely by texting while driving – although cell phone use has remained relatively flat in recent years, texting has increased rapidly.

And lest you think that these rates are happenstance, or that the deaths are coincidence, consider the following:  the researchers found not only this staggering death rate, but an increase in particular types of crashes.  For example, growing numbers of accidents involve crashes into trees, light poles, and other stationary objects, the hallmark of a driver too distracted to even watch the road and keep his car on course.  Our Chicago car accident attorneys have seen the increase in such textbook distracted-driving accidents.

FocusDriven, an organization that advocates against distracted driving, puts the problem properly in perspective.  As board member Jennifer Smith has noted, the 5,000 annual American deaths from cell phone use and texting while driving is roughly equivalent to a commercial passenger airplane crashing every week for a year.  As Ms. Smith noted, “If that was happening, they would ground all flights until they figured out what the problem was and they solved it.”

But cell phone use, and texting, are wildly popular.  Although people are frightened of others engaging in these behaviors while driving, many people – including our lawmakers – engage in them themselves.  That makes getting effective legislation in place extremely difficult.  Our Chicago wrongful death attorneys echo the sentiments of FocusDriven:  if anything else were causing these numbers of deaths, our legislators would have acted by now.

Other research, which our injury attorneys have previously discussed, shows that texting while driving increases the risk of an accident by about the same amount as driving drunk.  Although many, including lawmakers, have an immediate reaction of doubt when they hear this, the research was straightforward and undeniable:  when the overall accident rate is compared to the accident rate of those driving drunk and those driving while texting, we see accidents increase by the same rate in each group.

The research released last week thus adds yet another troubling layer to the debate over cell phone use while driving.  The researchers found that drunk drivers are also more likely to use a cell phone or text while driving, perhaps because of lowered inhibitions and awareness of risk.  As if each of these behaviors alone were not dangerous enough, innocent drivers and pedestrians are thus faced with drivers engaging in both.

The government response:  a “summit” held in Washington, D.C., at which our leaders and lawmakers called for tougher laws to combat this growing menace.  While such a show is certainly appropriate, it is no longer adequate.  We call on our leaders to stop talking, and lead.

Not that there has been no government action at all.  Although this action has been stunted and truncated, it is happening, slowly but surely.  For instance, at the beginning of the year, truckers and other commercial drivers who use interstate highways were prohibited from sending text messages while on the road.  And the City of Chicago has banned the use of hand-held cellphones while driving.  That leaves a patchwork of surrounding suburbs and unincorporated areas unprotected, however, and many of the governing bodies of these areas have voted against appropriate restrictions.

Slow and steady is no longer acceptable.   We simply must have a statewide ban, in every state, on the use of hand-held cellphones and other text-messaging devices while driving.  Ideally, we would also have a federal ban on such behavior on interstate highways, by private drivers as well as commercial.

In the meantime, the innocent victims of distracted driving must stand up to these wrongdoers.  If the government will not protect us from distracted drivers, then we must protect each other – by bringing civil actions against such drivers when they injure the innocent, and thereby making drivers think twice before picking up the smartphone.

For a free consultation with an experienced Chicago wrongful death lawyer at Passen Law Group, call us at (312) 527-4500.

share save 171 16 Texting While Driving Continues to Pose Major Road Risk

Commercial Processed Meats “Too Dangerous For Human Consumption”

Saturday, September 25th, 2010

Americans have known for years that eating processed meats, such as hot dogs and lunch meats, is not the best nutritional choice.  What many do not know is that the World Cancer Research Fund (the WCRF) has made it official.   According to the WCRF, commercial processed meats are “too dangerous for human consumption.”  Our Chicago personal injury lawyers urge consumers to follow take this proclamation seriously.

The WCRF reached this conclusion after conducting an exhaustive and comprehensive review of the available research:  over 7,000 clinical studies dealing with the interaction of diet and cancer.  What they found was shocking enough to cause them to issue their proclamation against processed meats.

For example, one study conducted by the University of Hawaii and included in the WCRF’s review found that eating processed meats increases the risk of pancreatic cancer by an astounding 67%.  Likewise, a person who consumes 50 grams of processed meat daily (which is admittedly a great deal) increases her risk of colorectal cancer by 50%.

It was these and other similar shocking figures that lead to the WCRF’s classification and recommendations.  Those recommendations surprised many:  the WCRF does not urge consumers to restrict their intake of these foods, eat them in moderation, or even eat them as an occasional indulgence.  Instead, the WCRF urges consumers to immediately and completely remove these foods from their diets.

Processed meats include any meat product with added sodium nitrate, an extremely commonly-used preservative.  Sodium nitrate is the additive used to give commercially-processed red meat a lasting pink or red tint, so that it appears fresh.  It is virtually never found in chicken or fish, but is commonly used in:

•    hot dogs
•    lunch meats, especially those used at chain sandwich shops
•    frozen meats
•    frozen bacon
•    many sausages
•    pepperoni, especially on frozen pizzas
•    beef jerky
•    kids’ meals
•    canned soups with red meat
•    ravioli and meat pasta
•    nearly all red meats served at public schools, hospitals, restaurants, and hotels.

What is truly shocking is that the WCRF issued this proclamation not this week, not this month, but in 2007.  Yet, in spite of this, our federal regulators have still taken no action to address this serious threat to the nation’s health.

The reason is obvious:  processed meats are everywhere, and they are big business.  In fact, the USDA tried to ban sodium nitrate back in the 1970′s – before the problem had become as pervasive as it is today.  That effort, however, was blocked by the lobbyists and cash of the meat and food industries.

But now, with literally decades more research confirming what the USDA knew in the 1970s, why has our government failed to act?  Why, three years after the WCRF’s comprehensive review and proclamation, have the FDA and the USDA not taken action?  The almighty dollar, of course.

Our Chicago products liability attorneys urge the FDA and USDA to again take up this issue, and to do what is necessary to protect the public.  It is these agencies’ job, after all, to regulate the industries – not to allow them to dictate policy in order to enhance their profits at the expense of public health.

In the meantime, we must each take responsibility for our own health.  Avoiding these foods is not as simple as it seems:  labels must be read carefully to detect the presence of sodium nitrate, which is often hidden as a secondary ingredient (listed in a parenthetical after a primary ingredient) or even listed as a “preservative.”  Additionally, increasing our consumption of produce may help – in addition to fruits and vegetables’ other healthy properties, there is some evidence that vitamin C (found in citrus fruits and many berries) can help to offset the damage done by processed meats.

For a free consultation with an experienced Chicago personal injury lawyer at Passen Law Group, call us at (312) 527-4500.

share save 171 16 Commercial Processed Meats “Too Dangerous For Human Consumption”

Newborn Coalition Aims to Prevent Birth Injury Malpractice

Thursday, September 23rd, 2010

Our Chicago birth injury lawyers have often noted that breakdowns in medical care during delivery and immediately after can have permanent, life-altering consequences for infants and their parents.  Now, a new public policy group called the Newborn Coalition has formed to address these issues, and work for improved healthcare for these vulnerable new lives.

The timing could not be better.  In spite of the low and declining infant mortality and morbidity rates among industrialized nations worldwide, America has fallen behind.  In recent years, our nation has consistently ranked around 40th in infant mortality rates – behind virtually every other industrialized nation.  Worse yet, America’s infant mortality rate is actually rising, while the rates in other nations continue to drop.

Much of that is due to problems in the delivery itself.  The United States has one of the world’s highest rates of unnecessary surgical deliveries – major abdominal surgery which experts say is dangerous to both mother and infant.  Moreover, negligence at delivery (from improper monitoring to more active problems) can and often does lead to infant brain injury or death.  After delivery, many hospitals and care providers are simply not prepared to deal with health problems in infants – from poor training to poor record-keeping, antiquated systems for sharing information with other hospitals, doctors, and specialists.

That’s why our medical malpractice lawyers are thrilled to hear of the formation of the Newborn Coalition.  It is far too easy to turn a blind eye to these issues, because no one wants to imagine herself ever facing them.  Expectant parents, and those who hope to someday be expectant, imagine themselves experiencing the smooth delivery of a healthy newborn.  Most of us simply do not want to imagine the possibility that things could go otherwise.  Unfortunately, this makes advocating for the necessary changes in the current system difficult.

That’s where the Newborn Coalition comes in.  The organization’s stated goal is to be “a vocal advocate for the newest, most vulnerable citizens through partnerships and programs that enhance health care for newborns and their families.”  It will do so by working to “improve understanding of newborn health and risk factors while helping drive policies that enhance educational outreach, improve outcomes, access to quality care, and craft sustainable, scalable, technology-based practices benefiting newborns.”

The Newborn Coalition was founded by women whose lives have been intimately affected by issues of Newborn Health.  The coalition is made up of a number of “stakeholders” in newborn medical care.  This includes the American Telemedicine Association, VisionShare, the Health IT NOW Coalition and 1in100, among other individuals and groups concerned with improving infant healthcare.

Mary Ellen Mannix, an advisory board member, lost her infant son in 2001 to several “breakdowns in his medical care,” a polite way to term negligence or medical malpractice at birth.  She now works to improve pediatric patient safety and enhance communication among the various entities involved in infant healthcare.  Annamarie Saarinan, co-founder and advisory board member, was more fortunate – although her infant daughter was diagnosed with congenital heart failure at two days old, she eventually received the necessary treatment and her life was saved.  Ms. Saarinan notes, however, that this experience has made her aware of the “pitfalls” in obtaining adequate newborn medical care.

Our medical malpractice attorneys urge the Newborn  Coalition to push its mission nationwide – and we urge the leaders of both the healthcare industry and our nation to take notice, and respond to the coalition’s leadership and suggestions.

For a free consultation with an experienced Chicago birth injury lawyer at Passen Law Group, call us at (312) 527-4500.

share save 171 16 Newborn Coalition Aims to Prevent Birth Injury Malpractice