Archive for the ‘Motorcycle Injury’ Category

Your Rights When a Drunk Driver Strikes

Saturday, November 26th, 2011

drunk driving accidents Your Rights When a Drunk Driver StrikesWho Is at Fault?

This may seem like an obvious question: the drunk driver whose careless driving caused injury to another is, of course, at fault.  However, others may be legally accountable as well.

For instance, if the drunk driver was a minor, or was served alcohol while visibly intoxicated, you may have a cause of action under the Illinois Dram Shop Act against the bar, restaurant, or club which served alcohol to the driver.  Dram Shop cases are subject to certain limitations- including time limits and liability caps.

If the drunk driver was in the scope of his employment at the time of the accident, you may also have a cause of action against his or her employer.  This is what is referred to as “respondeat superior” or “vicarious liability.”

There may be others who share responsibility as well, which is why it is important to speak with an attorney experienced drunk driver injury lawyer.

Financial Recovery

In many cases, the victim of a drunk driver can recover what are knows and “economic” and “noneconomic” damages. Economic damages are concrete, out-of-pocket costs: past and future medical bills, lost wages, decreased earning potential, and others. Noneconomic damages are less concrete, including things like emotional distress, pain and suffering, humiliation, loss of reputation, and even, at times, inconvenience.

The rights of drunk-driving victims extend beyond those of typical personal injury plaintiffs, as well. In most cases, drunk driving is not simply negligent – it is reckless or intentional. On this basis, the victim of a drunk driver can often seek and recover punitive damages – an award by the jury above and beyond economic and noneconomic damages, designed to punish the drunk driver and to deter others who might otherwise drive drunk.

You may also be able to recover under your own auto insurance policy under what’s referred to as uninsured motorist (UM) or underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage, in the event that the drunk driver is either uninsured or has an inadequate insurance policy.

What to do After the Accident

Many of the most important steps in pursuing legal action against the drunk driver who injured you should take place before you have had a chance to speak with a top car accident attorney like those at Passen Law Group.

First and foremost, after an accident you should seek medical attention immediately. Some very serious injuries – including traumatic brain injury, neck injuries, and spinal injuries – can have symptoms that may develop immediately, or may take days to develop. Likewise, psychological injury from the crash, such as anxiety problems, fear of driving, and depression, can take days, weeks, or months to develop. If you experience these problems, seek medical attention.

Second, preserve any evidence of the crash. Get the driver’s contact information, insurance information, and vehicle information. Even if the drunk driver admits liability at the time of the accident, you can expect him or his insurance company to contest liability later. So, take down the name (double checking the spelling) and phone number or numbers of every person who saw the accident – do not rely on the police to do this for you.

Third, preserve evidence of your injuries and damages. Take pictures of any visible injuries, both initially and as they heal. Take pictures of your car, before it is repaired. If possible, take pictures of the other car, as well. And, if you were a pedestrian or cyclist struck by a drunk driver, take a picture of yourself at the accident site in the clothing you were wearing, and preserve your clothing in its original condition

Finally, report the accident to the proper authorities and to your insurance company. Do not, however, discuss the accident with an insurance adjustor for the drunk driver.  An insurance adjustor is not an independent investigator – it is her job to try to defeat your claim. The best and easiest way to prevent this is to decline to speak with her. Additionally, do not sign any forms for the driver’s insurance company, including medical authorizations – you are not legally obligated to do so, and signing is almost never in your best interest.

These tips and information can help to get you started. But it is only a start. If you or someone you love was injured by a drunk driver, you will also need to speak with an experienced attorney, as soon as possible. Your attorney can counsel you on your options, help you decide how to proceed, and ensure that you do not miss key deadlines for the claims you want to file – often a key point in drunk driving cases.

Please give us a call us at 312-527-4500 or email us at info@passenlaw.com for a complimentary consultation. You can also learn more by following us on Twitter, reviewing our LinkedIn or Avvo.com pages, and by reviewing our website.

‘Understanding Distracted Driving’ Aims to Reduce Crashes

Tuesday, October 11th, 2011

distracted driving chart 300x224 Understanding Distracted Driving Aims to Reduce CrashesThe experienced car accident attorneys of Passen Law Group have frequently written about the dangers of distracted driving. Now, a new video series from the National Safety Council, based here in Illinois, aims to fight this problem with honest, straight-talk discussion of the risks.

See chart from The University of North Carolina Highway Safety Research Center addressing the types of distractions facing drivers.

Understanding Distracted Driving

The new series, titled “Understanding Distracted Driving,” is made up of a series of individual videos featuring NSC Senior Director of Transportation Initiatives, David Teater. But Teater is far more than just a talking head.

To the contrary, Teater knows only too well the true personal costs of distracted driving. Teater’s 12-year-old son was killed by a distracted driver in a tragic car crash.

In others, he answers typical questions about distracted driving, provides analysis on how cell phones can cause cognitive distractions, even when used hands-free, and provides advice on how companies can reduce the dangers of distracted driving for their employees.

There are a number of laws in place in Chicago and statewide which prohibit or limit distracted driving. Drivers are banned from using cell phones while driving in the city, for example. Likewise, throughout the state, cell phone use is banned in school zones and construction zones. Texting while driving is also banned, under any circumstances, statewide. And school bus drivers, as well as drivers under 19 years of age, may not use cell phones while driving.

But the reality is far more complex. Those who live or work in Chicago know that the law prohibiting cell phone use is honored more in the breach than in the observance. This is often the case as to the cell phone restrictions statewide, as well.

The true reality is that, while many now know of accidents caused by distracted driving, they do not believe it can happen to them. We urge all drivers to view the Understanding Distracted Driving video series, and to take its messages to heart.

We likewise urge those injured by distracted drivers to take action against the negligent drivers responsible for their injuries. While public awareness campaigns have failed, perhaps the risk of civil liability will succeed to deter drivers from these dangerous behaviors.

If you have any questions about a motor vehicle accident, please give us a call us at 312-527-4500 or email us at info@passenlaw.com for a complimentary consultation. You can also learn more by following us on Twitter, reviewing our LinkedIn or Avvo.com pages, and by reviewing our website.

Motorcycle Accident Law in Illinois

Friday, August 26th, 2011

Motorcycle riding can be a convenient, and exhilarating form of transport — and an increasingly popular pastime.  Unfortunately, motorcycle crashes are all too common.

Motorcyclists are killed and disabled at alarming rates when compared to other types of passengers. This is often not due to any particular danger inherent in cycling.  Instead, it reflects a failure by automobile drivers to take proper precautions to avoid devastating motorcycle accidents or, less frequently, a failure by the rider himself to understand the peculiar safety precautions and rules of the road applicable to cyclists.

The experienced motorcycle accident lawyers of Passen Law Group have previously written on the typical causes of motorcycle accidents, and the need for automobile drives to behave responsibly in order to avoid them. Today we look at the Illinois rules on motorcycles from the perspective of the rider himself.

Helmets

Illinois is one of a small minority of states that does not mandate that riders wear helmets. The use of a helmet, however, is the single best step a rider can take to reduce the risk of death or life-altering brain injury should an accident occur.

No matter how skilled and careful the rider, he or she cannot prevent accidents caused by the negligence of drivers around him. While the lawyers of Passen Law Group can help these riders and their families obtain legal recovery, this cannot bring back what was lost. We urge all riders to wear helmets, at all times.

Moreover, the failure to wear a helmet can make legal recovery more difficult. Judges and juries are often reluctant to allow awards to cyclists riding without a helmet, even if the accident was demonstrably the fault of the automobile driver.

Although a helmet is not required, Illinois does require all riders to use eye protection. Riders can choose to fulfill this requirement by wearing sunglasses or goggles, or equipping their bike with a windscreen. And if a rider does choose to wear a helmet, helmet speakers can only be used for communication – not music or other entertainment.

Bikes

All motorcycles must be equipped with a rearview mirror, which can be mounted on either the right or left side. All motorcycles must also be equipped with a muffler, which cannot be altered to cause it to amplify, rather than decrease, the noise of the bike. Unlike some states, Illinois does not require that cycles be outfitted with turn signals.

If the rider wishes to carry passengers, the bike must be equipped with both a  passenger seat and a  footrest. There is no age limit for motorcycle passengers in Illinois. Whether equipped for passenger use or not, the handgrips on the motorcycle’s handlebars cannot extend above shoulder height.

Unlike many states, Illinois does not require regular safety inspections for motorcycles registered in the state. Our experienced motorcycle death attorneys however, recommend that all riders subject their bike to a full safety inspection on a regular basis.

Use of Lanes

Illinois law does not permit lane splitting, the practice of avoiding or passing traffic by moving between lanes. The law in Illinois is silent, however, on the question of lane sharing, the practice of more than one rider riding side-by-side within the lane. This silence leads most experts to the conclusion that this practice is permitted and, indeed, it is the custom in the state.

Our experienced attorneys encourage all riders in the state to stay familiar with the rules and requirements in the state of Illinois. Careful observance of the rules can not only keep a rider safe, but also prevent him from sabotaging his own case, should an accident occur.

For a free consultation with an experienced Chicago motorcycle lawyer at Passen Law Group, call us at (312) 527-4500.

NTSB Focuses on Motorcycle Safety

Friday, January 21st, 2011

At the close of last year, the National Transportation Safety Board took an important step towards protecting America’s motorcyclists.  In November, the NTSB added improvements in motorcycle safety to its Most Wanted List of Transportation Safety Improvements – a list that defines the Board’s legislative and administrative priorities.  The Chicago motorcycle injury attorneys of Passen Law Group are encouraged by this step, although disappointed that the Board chose to focus only on riders and not on the motorists who often injure or kill them.

The Board’s action was prompted by the recent rise in fatalities from motorcycle accidents.   In the years from 1997 to 2008, highway fatalities nationwide declined.  In that same time period, however, people killed in motorcycle accidents not only increased, they more than doubled (they increased by 150 percent).  Moreover, motorcycle fatalities represent an astounding 13 percent of all American motor vehicle fatalities.  Yet motorcycles represent only 3 percent of the vehicles registered nationwide.

The NTSB’s motorcycle safety recommendations were originally issued in 2007.  At that time, the Board set forth six key improvements which they would like to see.  These recommendations were designed to improve motorcycle safety and decrease the number of fatalities among motorcyclists riding on on America’s highways.  Now, three years later – with the NTSB’s recommendations still not universally adopted – the Board has added motorcycle safety to its “most wanted” list.

Among the NTSB’s focus points is a request that states enact universal helmet laws.  Wearing a helmet while riding is perhaps the single greatest thing that a rider can do to improve his chances of surviving a crash – and surviving without permanent, disabling traumatic brain injury.  Riders who do not wear helmets suffer head injuries at around twice the rate of helmeted riders.  And states which have enacted helmet laws have seen motorcycle fatalities decrease by around 37 percent.  As the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration has estimated, motorcycle helmets saved 1,829 lives in 2008 alone.

At present 27 states, including Illinois, do not have laws requiring all motorcyclists to wear a helmet at all times.  But Illinois is one of only 3 states that have no law requiring helmet use – not even a partial requirement.

Our top motorcycle accident lawyers join the NTSB in advocating for this important safety legislation.  In the meantime, we urge our readers and clients to always wear a helmet.  Not only is this a crucial safety precaution, but it is also an important legal precaution.

Many, many collisions between a motorcycle and an automobile are entirely the fault of the automobile’s driver.   If, however, the injured rider was not wearing a helmet, juries have a tendency to view him as irresponsible, and conclude that at least some of his injuries were his own fault.  As unfair as this conclusion may be, it is a reality, and one that riders should take pains to avoid.

While we are pleased to see that the NTSB is taking action to improve motorcycle safety, we are disappointed that the focus of the Board’s action is so narrow.  Putting the focus solely on helmet requirement in effect confirms the prejudice that riders are responsible for the injuries and deaths coming from motorcycle accidents.  We at Passen Law Group know that the story is not quite that simple.

We urge the NTSB to improve its motorcycle safety campaign by broadening its focus to what may be done to encourage or force automobile drivers to behave responsibly towards motorcyclists.  Encouraging the states to enact and enforce harsher penalties for drivers who injure or kill cyclists would be an important step.  Equally important is educating drivers on how to watch for and avoid not only other cars and trucks, but motorcycles, as well.  The NTSB should consider ways to encourage the states to properly educate licensed drivers on these important issues.  This, like mandatory helmet use, could have a substantial impact on the number of unnecessary motorcycle fatalities.

For a free consultation with an experienced Chicago motorcycle injury attorney at Passen Law Group, call us at (312) 527-4500.