Posts Tagged ‘Car Crash Attorney’

Dangerous Car Seats Recalled

Tuesday, May 3rd, 2011

The child injury attorneys of Passen Law Group have learned of another widespread consumer recall of a defective and dangerous product for infants and children.  Dorel Juvenile Group (DJG), in cooperation with the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), recently issued a recall of a number of immensely popular car seats manufactured under its corporate umbrella.

These seats have a defect which allows the harness adjustment strap to loosen while the carseat is in use. As our car accident attorneys are only too well aware, this is a serious problem for car seat safety.  Because children and infants must be securely fastened into a car seat for maximum safety, this could greatly increase the risk of injury, and severe injury, in the event of a crash.

The recalled car seats include both infant seats and convertible and booster carseats for toddlers and preschoolers.  Some of the seats were also sold as part of a stroller travel system.  The recalled car seats were manufactured between May 1, 2007 and April 30, 2009.

All the affected seats were sold under the brands Cosco, Maxi-Cosi, Eddie Bauer, Julie Vallese, and Safety 1st.  The models affected include Alpha Omega, Alpha Omega Elite, Enspira, Priori, Prospect, and Vantage (convertible seats), and Mico and OnBoard (infant seats).  All were manufactured by DJG.

These are some of the most popular car seat brands and models in the nation.  The recall affects not thousands, not tens of thousands, but nearly 800,000 carseats nationwide.

The company instructs consumers who own these car seats to continue to use them until the problem is repaired, but to adjust the harness adjustment strap to fit snuggly each time a child is buckled in.

Although the company has issued a recall, it refuses to admit to the magnitude of the problem.  Although DJG concedes that it has received nearly 150 complaints from consumers about the loosened straps, it continues to assert that there is no danger from the product defect.  DJG continues to assert that the loosening straps were not a “safety defect,” but were simply a “performance issue.”  To the contrary, however, car seat experts emphasize the importance of secure fastenings to receive any real safety benefit from the seat.

DJG notes that there are no reports of injuries or deaths from the problem. We  note, however, that this is likely because those were injured were unaware of the defect or those who became aware of the loosened straps stopped using the seats.

Nor was the recall initiated by DJG itself.  Instead, the impetus for the recall came from the NHTSA, who received complaints from consumers and began an investigation into the problem.

The company is, however, taking some responsibility for correcting the problem.  For owners who have registered their carseat with DJG, the company will contact them and instruct them on how to receive a free repair kit.  Owners who have not registered their car seat can obtain a repair kit through DJG’s website, or by calling the company’s toll-free number (1-866-623-3139).

For a free consultation with an experienced Chicago child injury lawyer at Passen Law Group, call us at (312) 527-4500.

share save 171 16 Dangerous Car Seats Recalled

Child Safety in Autos and Air

Monday, February 14th, 2011

While severe injuries and deaths in automobile accidents are always tragic, there is perhaps nothing more disheartening than the loss of a young life – a child injured or killed in a crash.  This tragedy is only compounded when the injury or death of these innocent youngsters could have been avoided through the use of proper child safety seats and restraints.

With that in mind, the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) is devoting 2011 to a year-long effort to educate the public about child transportation safety, through a campaign designed to reach parents and other caregivers, state and federal regulatory agencies, and the transportation industry itself.  The campaign is focused on the need for proper child seats, booster seats, and child restraints.  As our experienced Chicago accident attorneys know, this simple precaution, so often ignored, is the single best and easiest way to protect children traveling in automobiles and airplanes.

The NTSB’s campaign includes a public forum, held at the close of last year, titled ‘Child Passenger Safety in the Air and in Automobiles.”  The forum was broadcast live via a webcast, which is still available to the public on the NTSB’s website, www.ntsb.gov/children.  Also available on the site are short videos on child passenger safety used during the forum, including a set of videos depicting a car accident that killed 4 children and severely injured two others, and a simulation of how the children would have been protected had they been properly secured in age-appropriate booster seats.

Likewise, the current campaign also focuses on the use of proper child restraints in airplanes.  At the end of last year, the Federal Department of Transportation’s Future of Aviation Advisory Committee (FAAC) presented 23 recommendations to DOT Secretary Ray LaHood.  Among those recommendations were several related to child airplane safety.

First, the FAAC recommended that Secretary LaHood utilize DOT resources to educate parents and the public about the dangers of holding a child on a parent’s lap while flying.  The Committee further recommended that the DOT update safety and economic data on child airplane passengers, and consider taking steps up to and including rulemaking in response to that data.

National Transportation Safety Board Chairman Deborah A. P. Hersman believes that these recommendations do not go far enough.  As she stated, “We appreciate the FAAC acknowledging the dangers associated with children flying on their parents’ laps, but we would have preferred to see the FAA be mandated to require that every person including our youngest children be restrained appropriately for their age and size.  We know that the safest place for children younger than age two traveling on airplanes is in an appropriate child safety seat. The era of the lap child on airplanes should come to an end.”

Our aviation crash attorneys applaud Chairman Hersman for her fierce advocacy for child airplane safety, and agree that the recommendations, while a good step, are inadequate.  While airplane crashes are infrequent, when they do occur the damage – particularly to young children – can be great.  Any inconvenience caused by the simple step of properly securing children in age-appropriate seats and harnesses is far outweighed by the safety benefit these seats confer.

The child injury attorneys of Passen Law Group wish the NTSB luck in its year-long child safety campaign.  We urge all parents and caregivers to view the Board’s videos before making decisions about car and air travel, and to take these simple steps to protect our nation’s children.

For a free consultation with an experienced Chicago injury attorney at Passen Law Group, call us at (312) 527-4500.

share save 171 16 Child Safety in Autos and Air

Red-Light Cameras Do Not Make Intersections Safer

Monday, July 5th, 2010

Chicago intersection camera 262x300 Red Light Cameras Do Not Make Intersections SaferCook County recently announced plans to install twenty new red-light cameras throughout the Chicago suburbs, in what the County Board describes as a one-year pilot program.  The suburbs targeted to receive these new cameras, however, are protesting and considering legal action.  Our Chicago car accident lawyers believe this chain of events engenders many questions:  Why is the County doing this?  Why are the suburbs protesting?  And does all of this really make Chicago-area drivers any safer?

We have been following this story with great interest.  Although red-light cameras are increasingly popular with various levels of government, the most recent data shows that they do not make intersections safer.  Indeed, it now appears that the opposite may be true.  So why install more?  The answer is simple:  the almighty dollar.

The University of Illinois at Chicago recently performed a comprehensive analysis of accidents at Chicago intersections, including the 188 Chicago intersections with red-light cameras.  The study was based on data from the Illinois Department of transportation, and was performed by comparing accident data from the year before the Chicago red-light cameras were installed, and the year after.

What the UIC researchers found will not shock intelligent observers, but is certainly shocking in light of Cook County’s hunger for more cameras:  although accidents in the Chicago area decreased overall, there has been no decrease in car accidents at intersections with red-light cameras.  Indeed, at area intersections where a red-light camera was installed, accidents have actually increased by five percent.  UIC Assistant Professor Rajiv Shah, discussing the study, summed up the importance of the data.  “The clearest thing is the red light cameras have not changed driving behavior in any significant pattern.”

So, why the continued interest in red-light cameras?  Chicago-area governments would have you believe that they are only concerned with your safety. Even after the UIC study was made public, the Chicago Department of Transportation continued to insist that red-light cameras increase public safety.  The CDOT has publicly stated that the UIC study was flawed, because it included data on accidents that occurred up to 250 feet from the center of the intersection.  The CDOT states that it is conducting its own analysis, using a much more limited definition of an “intersection,” and that its “preliminary analysis” shows a twenty percent reduction in crashes at intersections with cameras.  That must be a narrow definition indeed.

So why does Cook County want to install new cameras?  Anyone who has been following the County’s recent budget woes should easily answer that question.  Our Chicago personal injury attorneys know that red-light cameras mean big bucks for those who install them, plain and simple.  If you think that this is an overly cynical view, consider the following:  the county has already budgeted for a minimum of $2 million in revenue from the twenty proposed cameras.  And the City of Chicago collected around $109 million from red-light camera revenues between 2003, when it began installing the cameras, through 2008 – with about $44 million of that coming in 2008 alone.

The greed associated with these cameras is not limited to the County Board.  FOX Chicago News reported early in 2010 that yellow lights at Chicago intersections with red-light cameras (installed by the City) had been set shorter – and even failed to meet the federally-required minimum of three seconds in length.  You don’t need a traffic expert to tell you that shortening the length of a yellow light is not a move designed to increase safety.  This action is designed to catch more drivers, and increase the revenue from red-light cameras.

It remains to be seen whether the Chicago suburbs will be successful in their fight to keep the Cook County Board from installing red-light cameras within suburban municipalities.  But our Chicago car crash lawyers believe that such cameras will be installed in any event.  What the current fight will determine is who will install them, and thus who will receive the revenue.

While suburban residents may believe that their municipal governments are fighting to keep such cameras out, the fact remains that none of these governments have stated a blanket opposition to red-light cameras, or even championed the UIC’s safety data.  Instead, they have simply insisted that the County Board does not have the authority to install the cameras, because the municipalities police the roads.  If they win that battle, expect to see the suburbs themselves install cameras in the near future.

After all, red-light cameras are now big business.

For a free consultation with an experienced Chicago personal injury lawyer at Passen Law Group, call us at (312) 527-4500.

share save 171 16 Red Light Cameras Do Not Make Intersections Safer