Posts Tagged ‘Chicago Car Accident Lawyer’

Study Finds Drunk Driving Is Shockingly Common

Thursday, September 2nd, 2010

After years of costly public education campaigns, school drivers’ education scare-tactic videos, and reports of grisly deaths, you would think that drivers should have absorbed the message that driving while intoxicated is an unacceptable risk.  You would be wrong.  Our Chicago injury attorneys have seen far too many fatalities and catastrophic injuries from drunken driving to believe that this behavior is abating.  Now, a new study confirms that Americans are still drinking and driving – and at an alarming rate.

A newly released government study found that one in twelve drivers admitted to having driven drunk in the previous year.  The study was conducted by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.  Although the data was collected in 2008, the results were released last week.

Specifically, the study asked individuals whether they had driven when they believed that their blood alcohol level exceeded the legal limit of .08%.  This figure is particularly shocking when you consider the fact that it is likely that additional people engaged in this highly dangerous behavior but were too embarrassed to admit it.

In addition, a staggering one in five people admit to having driven within two hours of consuming alcohol.  Although this does not necessarily mean that these individuals were intoxicated when they drove, it is still dangerous behavior.  Of this group, the study also asked how many drinks they believed they could consume and still safely drive.  Forty percent of these individuals indicated that they could safely drive after consuming three drinks.  A terrifying eleven percent believed they could safely drive after consuming five drinks.  This behavior explains why injury and wrongful death from drunk driving are still so common:  apparently, at least twenty percent of American drivers simply do not understand the physiology of alcohol consumption, and are accordingly putting us all at risk.

Another facet of the study shows the profound disconnect between individuals’ logical evaluation of risk and the behavior they engage in themselves.  Four out of five people in the study stated that they believe that drunk driving is a major threat to their safety.  Indeed, this belief is well founded, as statistics compiled by the Federal Department of Transportation show that around a third of motor vehicle accidents resulting in fatalities stem from drunken driving.  Yet these individuals are still engaging in the practice themselves.  This goes far beyond negligence, to a willful disregard for the lives that will cross the paths of their paths.

Individuals seem willing to tolerate dangerous behavior in their friends, as well as themselves.  Like those who admitted to driving drunk, one in twelve people admitted to having ridden in a car with a drunk driver within the past year.  One group in particular was prone to this behavior:  young men aged 21 to 24 years.  Of this group, one in four admitted to riding with an impaired driver.

As NHTSA Administrator David Strickland eloquently stated, “We have to do more as a country to close the gap between believing that drunk driving is a threat and actively doing something about it.”  The first step is to make drunk drivers pay for their actions, and the devastating consequences.  If you or someone you love has been injured or killed by a drunk driver, it is crucial that you take action.  If this behavior is ever going to change, we must send a strong message that our society simply will not tolerate this abuse.  We urge you to speak with an experienced Chicago car accident attorney about your options.  Your courage and resolve could save lives.

Drunk driving is a particular problem over summer holiday weekends.  That’s why police nationwide will be putting on a two-week-long assault on drunk driving surrounding the upcoming labor day weekend.  Patrols and checkpoints will be greatly increased for those two weeks, in the hope of catching offenders, preventing accidents, and dissuading offenders from future drunk driving.

For a free consultation with an experienced Chicago personal injury lawyer at Passen Law Group, call us at (312) 527-4500.

Toyota Again Puts Spin Before Safety

Monday, July 12th, 2010

Our Toyota car accident attorneys have commented on the rash of evidence coming to light of the negligent safety practices at Toyota Motor Corporation.  Just when many had become convinced that Toyota had turned a corner, and that we had learned all there is to learn about the auto company’s misdeeds and its disregard for the safety of its consumers, yet another delayed recall has come to light.

Last week, Toyota announced a recall of almost 139,000 Lexus automobiles.  This latest recall relates to potential defects in valve springs, which can leave to engine failures.  All told, the company expects this recall to extend to about 270,000 luxury vehicles, including Lexus cars and Toyota Crown autos.  The recall will extend to vehicles in the United States, as well as Japan, Australia, Canada, Europe, and elsewhere.  Toyota has now recalled over ten million vehicles worldwide over the course of a few short months.

In the first and most highly publicized of the recent recalls, Toyota recalled a series of vehicles whose accelerators could become stuck.  The public then learned that Toyota waited at least four months, after learning of this extremely dangerous sudden acceleration defect, before informing U.S. authorities.  The second publicity disaster involved the Toyota recall of SUVs and pickups whose steering systems can break, causing drivers to lose control of the vehicles.  Shockingly, in that instance it came out that after learning of the defect Toyota waited at least a year before informing U.S. authorities and issuing the U.S. recall.

The stories grow ever more shocking.  Our Chicago wrongful death attorneys were startled to learn that this time, Toyota waited over three years from the time it first learned of the defect until it notified U.S. authorities and issued a recall.  Indeed, Toyota first learned of the defect comprising last week’s recall at least as early as March of 2007.  Although there have not yet been any reports of accidents or deaths arising from this particular defect, it seems highly likely that a defect leading to complete engine failure would eventually result in fatalities or serious injury.  Toyota’s decision to gamble with the lives of its customers and those in their paths for over three years is simply inexcusable.

It seems that Toyota has a pattern of disregarding consumer safety and unreasonably delaying product recalls.  This makes the role of courageous victims that much more important in forcing the company, and others like it, to readjust its priorities.  Toyota Motor Corporation has now conclusively demonstrated that it cannot be trusted to itself take measures to ensure public safety.  Nor can the U.S. authorities effectively force compliance from the automobile industry:  indeed, the latest series of recalls indicates that the industry is actively flouting its reporting obligations.

It is sad but true that many corporations will only take steps to protect consumers and the public when forced to do so – and civil litigation seems to be the only effective tool.  If you or someone you love has been injured or lost their life due to a defective product (whether a Toyota or not) or as a result of negligence in some other context, your courage to take action against the company may be the only thing that can force action, and prevent further injuries and death.

Contact one of our top-rated Chicago car accident lawyers.  We urge those injured by the negligence of Toyota to come forward, and to not only  make them pay for what they have done, but make them think twice about doing it again, for the fourth time.

For a free consultation with an experienced Chicago personal injury lawyer at Passen Law Group, call us at (312) 527-4500.

Red-Light Cameras Do Not Make Intersections Safer

Monday, July 5th, 2010

Chicago intersection camera 262x300 Red Light Cameras Do Not Make Intersections SaferCook County recently announced plans to install twenty new red-light cameras throughout the Chicago suburbs, in what the County Board describes as a one-year pilot program.  The suburbs targeted to receive these new cameras, however, are protesting and considering legal action.  Our Chicago car accident lawyers believe this chain of events engenders many questions:  Why is the County doing this?  Why are the suburbs protesting?  And does all of this really make Chicago-area drivers any safer?

We have been following this story with great interest.  Although red-light cameras are increasingly popular with various levels of government, the most recent data shows that they do not make intersections safer.  Indeed, it now appears that the opposite may be true.  So why install more?  The answer is simple:  the almighty dollar.

The University of Illinois at Chicago recently performed a comprehensive analysis of accidents at Chicago intersections, including the 188 Chicago intersections with red-light cameras.  The study was based on data from the Illinois Department of transportation, and was performed by comparing accident data from the year before the Chicago red-light cameras were installed, and the year after.

What the UIC researchers found will not shock intelligent observers, but is certainly shocking in light of Cook County’s hunger for more cameras:  although accidents in the Chicago area decreased overall, there has been no decrease in car accidents at intersections with red-light cameras.  Indeed, at area intersections where a red-light camera was installed, accidents have actually increased by five percent.  UIC Assistant Professor Rajiv Shah, discussing the study, summed up the importance of the data.  “The clearest thing is the red light cameras have not changed driving behavior in any significant pattern.”

So, why the continued interest in red-light cameras?  Chicago-area governments would have you believe that they are only concerned with your safety. Even after the UIC study was made public, the Chicago Department of Transportation continued to insist that red-light cameras increase public safety.  The CDOT has publicly stated that the UIC study was flawed, because it included data on accidents that occurred up to 250 feet from the center of the intersection.  The CDOT states that it is conducting its own analysis, using a much more limited definition of an “intersection,” and that its “preliminary analysis” shows a twenty percent reduction in crashes at intersections with cameras.  That must be a narrow definition indeed.

So why does Cook County want to install new cameras?  Anyone who has been following the County’s recent budget woes should easily answer that question.  Our Chicago personal injury attorneys know that red-light cameras mean big bucks for those who install them, plain and simple.  If you think that this is an overly cynical view, consider the following:  the county has already budgeted for a minimum of $2 million in revenue from the twenty proposed cameras.  And the City of Chicago collected around $109 million from red-light camera revenues between 2003, when it began installing the cameras, through 2008 – with about $44 million of that coming in 2008 alone.

The greed associated with these cameras is not limited to the County Board.  FOX Chicago News reported early in 2010 that yellow lights at Chicago intersections with red-light cameras (installed by the City) had been set shorter – and even failed to meet the federally-required minimum of three seconds in length.  You don’t need a traffic expert to tell you that shortening the length of a yellow light is not a move designed to increase safety.  This action is designed to catch more drivers, and increase the revenue from red-light cameras.

It remains to be seen whether the Chicago suburbs will be successful in their fight to keep the Cook County Board from installing red-light cameras within suburban municipalities.  But our Chicago car crash lawyers believe that such cameras will be installed in any event.  What the current fight will determine is who will install them, and thus who will receive the revenue.

While suburban residents may believe that their municipal governments are fighting to keep such cameras out, the fact remains that none of these governments have stated a blanket opposition to red-light cameras, or even championed the UIC’s safety data.  Instead, they have simply insisted that the County Board does not have the authority to install the cameras, because the municipalities police the roads.  If they win that battle, expect to see the suburbs themselves install cameras in the near future.

After all, red-light cameras are now big business.

For a free consultation with an experienced Chicago personal injury lawyer at Passen Law Group, call us at (312) 527-4500.