Posts Tagged ‘Chicago Car Accident Lawyer’

Toyota Again Puts Spin Before Safety

Monday, July 12th, 2010

Our Toyota car accident attorneys have commented on the rash of evidence coming to light of the negligent safety practices at Toyota Motor Corporation.  Just when many had become convinced that Toyota had turned a corner, and that we had learned all there is to learn about the auto company’s misdeeds and its disregard for the safety of its consumers, yet another delayed recall has come to light.

Last week, Toyota announced a recall of almost 139,000 Lexus automobiles.  This latest recall relates to potential defects in valve springs, which can leave to engine failures.  All told, the company expects this recall to extend to about 270,000 luxury vehicles, including Lexus cars and Toyota Crown autos.  The recall will extend to vehicles in the United States, as well as Japan, Australia, Canada, Europe, and elsewhere.  Toyota has now recalled over ten million vehicles worldwide over the course of a few short months.

In the first and most highly publicized of the recent recalls, Toyota recalled a series of vehicles whose accelerators could become stuck.  The public then learned that Toyota waited at least four months, after learning of this extremely dangerous sudden acceleration defect, before informing U.S. authorities.  The second publicity disaster involved the Toyota recall of SUVs and pickups whose steering systems can break, causing drivers to lose control of the vehicles.  Shockingly, in that instance it came out that after learning of the defect Toyota waited at least a year before informing U.S. authorities and issuing the U.S. recall.

The stories grow ever more shocking.  Our Chicago wrongful death attorneys were startled to learn that this time, Toyota waited over three years from the time it first learned of the defect until it notified U.S. authorities and issued a recall.  Indeed, Toyota first learned of the defect comprising last week’s recall at least as early as March of 2007.  Although there have not yet been any reports of accidents or deaths arising from this particular defect, it seems highly likely that a defect leading to complete engine failure would eventually result in fatalities or serious injury.  Toyota’s decision to gamble with the lives of its customers and those in their paths for over three years is simply inexcusable.

It seems that Toyota has a pattern of disregarding consumer safety and unreasonably delaying product recalls.  This makes the role of courageous victims that much more important in forcing the company, and others like it, to readjust its priorities.  Toyota Motor Corporation has now conclusively demonstrated that it cannot be trusted to itself take measures to ensure public safety.  Nor can the U.S. authorities effectively force compliance from the automobile industry:  indeed, the latest series of recalls indicates that the industry is actively flouting its reporting obligations.

It is sad but true that many corporations will only take steps to protect consumers and the public when forced to do so – and civil litigation seems to be the only effective tool.  If you or someone you love has been injured or lost their life due to a defective product (whether a Toyota or not) or as a result of negligence in some other context, your courage to take action against the company may be the only thing that can force action, and prevent further injuries and death.

Contact one of our top-rated Chicago car accident lawyers.  We urge those injured by the negligence of Toyota to come forward, and to not only  make them pay for what they have done, but make them think twice about doing it again, for the fourth time.

For a free consultation with an experienced Chicago personal injury lawyer at Passen Law Group, call us at (312) 527-4500.

share save 171 16 Toyota Again Puts Spin Before Safety

Red-Light Cameras Do Not Make Intersections Safer

Monday, July 5th, 2010

Chicago intersection camera 262x300 Red Light Cameras Do Not Make Intersections SaferCook County recently announced plans to install twenty new red-light cameras throughout the Chicago suburbs, in what the County Board describes as a one-year pilot program.  The suburbs targeted to receive these new cameras, however, are protesting and considering legal action.  Our Chicago car accident lawyers believe this chain of events engenders many questions:  Why is the County doing this?  Why are the suburbs protesting?  And does all of this really make Chicago-area drivers any safer?

We have been following this story with great interest.  Although red-light cameras are increasingly popular with various levels of government, the most recent data shows that they do not make intersections safer.  Indeed, it now appears that the opposite may be true.  So why install more?  The answer is simple:  the almighty dollar.

The University of Illinois at Chicago recently performed a comprehensive analysis of accidents at Chicago intersections, including the 188 Chicago intersections with red-light cameras.  The study was based on data from the Illinois Department of transportation, and was performed by comparing accident data from the year before the Chicago red-light cameras were installed, and the year after.

What the UIC researchers found will not shock intelligent observers, but is certainly shocking in light of Cook County’s hunger for more cameras:  although accidents in the Chicago area decreased overall, there has been no decrease in car accidents at intersections with red-light cameras.  Indeed, at area intersections where a red-light camera was installed, accidents have actually increased by five percent.  UIC Assistant Professor Rajiv Shah, discussing the study, summed up the importance of the data.  “The clearest thing is the red light cameras have not changed driving behavior in any significant pattern.”

So, why the continued interest in red-light cameras?  Chicago-area governments would have you believe that they are only concerned with your safety. Even after the UIC study was made public, the Chicago Department of Transportation continued to insist that red-light cameras increase public safety.  The CDOT has publicly stated that the UIC study was flawed, because it included data on accidents that occurred up to 250 feet from the center of the intersection.  The CDOT states that it is conducting its own analysis, using a much more limited definition of an “intersection,” and that its “preliminary analysis” shows a twenty percent reduction in crashes at intersections with cameras.  That must be a narrow definition indeed.

So why does Cook County want to install new cameras?  Anyone who has been following the County’s recent budget woes should easily answer that question.  Our Chicago personal injury attorneys know that red-light cameras mean big bucks for those who install them, plain and simple.  If you think that this is an overly cynical view, consider the following:  the county has already budgeted for a minimum of $2 million in revenue from the twenty proposed cameras.  And the City of Chicago collected around $109 million from red-light camera revenues between 2003, when it began installing the cameras, through 2008 – with about $44 million of that coming in 2008 alone.

The greed associated with these cameras is not limited to the County Board.  FOX Chicago News reported early in 2010 that yellow lights at Chicago intersections with red-light cameras (installed by the City) had been set shorter – and even failed to meet the federally-required minimum of three seconds in length.  You don’t need a traffic expert to tell you that shortening the length of a yellow light is not a move designed to increase safety.  This action is designed to catch more drivers, and increase the revenue from red-light cameras.

It remains to be seen whether the Chicago suburbs will be successful in their fight to keep the Cook County Board from installing red-light cameras within suburban municipalities.  But our Chicago car crash lawyers believe that such cameras will be installed in any event.  What the current fight will determine is who will install them, and thus who will receive the revenue.

While suburban residents may believe that their municipal governments are fighting to keep such cameras out, the fact remains that none of these governments have stated a blanket opposition to red-light cameras, or even championed the UIC’s safety data.  Instead, they have simply insisted that the County Board does not have the authority to install the cameras, because the municipalities police the roads.  If they win that battle, expect to see the suburbs themselves install cameras in the near future.

After all, red-light cameras are now big business.

For a free consultation with an experienced Chicago personal injury lawyer at Passen Law Group, call us at (312) 527-4500.

share save 171 16 Red Light Cameras Do Not Make Intersections Safer

Distracted Driving Leads to Injury and Wrongful Death

Tuesday, June 22nd, 2010

Our Chicago wrongful death attorneys have previously discussed some of the recent incidents in Illinois highlighting the dangers of distracted driving.  Although some still take distracted driving lightly, experts estimate that engaging in distracted driving is roughly comparable to driving after drinking four alcoholic beverages.  Distracted driving, while dangerous at all times, is particularly dangerous at high speeds.  At about 55 miles per hour, a driver who takes his eyes off the road for 5 seconds essentially drives the length of an entire football field with his eyes closed.

Some estimates put the percentage of automobile accidents in the United States caused by distracted driving as high as 80%.  Indeed, a distracted driver is 23 times as likely to be in an accident.  When drivers take their eyes off the road for as little as 2 seconds, crash risk doubles.  As many as 28% of accidents in the United States are caused by drivers distracted by cellphones and texting.  And while much of the media attention lately has focused on texting, the very real danger of driving while using a handheld cellphone should not be ignored.  Drivers using a handheld cellphone have a risk of causing an accident four times greater than those who refrain, and comparable to a drunk driver.  Yet studies show that 81% of Americans use a handheld cellphone while driving.

Additionally, many Americans mistakenly believe that driving while on a hands-free cellphone is no different than talking to a passenger in the car.  Yet science shows that this is false:  our brains process information differently depending upon whether we are talking to a live person or using a cellphone, and are unable to multitask as effectively while doing the later.  If you doubt this, ask yourself if, while having open-heart surgery, you would be comfortable with your surgeon chatting on a hands-free cellphone.  Your intuition should give you all the answer you need.

Distracted driving is a particular problem among teens and young drivers.  Our Chicago personal injury lawyers urge parents to carefully discuss distracted driving and its consequences with young drivers, and monitor their driving habits closely.  Drivers under 20, especially inexperienced drivers, have the highest rate of fatal crashes caused by distracted driving.  Drivers under 21, and those with less than 6 months experience, engage in a great number of bad driving practices.  As well as engaging in distracted driving, they are more likely to drive to quickly and drive too close to the car in front of them.

Legislation recently introduced in the Senate Commerce Committee could help to reverse this disturbing trend.  The legislation, called the Distracted Driving Prevention Act, aims to reduce distracted driving by encouraging state action.  If passed, the Act will provide grants to states who enact state legislation banning texting and the use of handheld cellphones, and the use of any cellphones by those under 18.  The bill’s other provisions are aimed at public education on the dangers of distracted driving, and research into safer mobile communications. The legislation is supported by the National Safety Council.  Our Chicago car accident attorneys join their voice with that of the NSC and urge the Senate to pass this legislation as soon as possible.

Allstate Insurance Company has also launched a campaign against distracted driving – but in Canada.  It calls the campaign “Action against Distraction.”  The campaign is focused on teenagers, and works with schools to reach them.  It tries to make students aware of the many simple distractions, from using a GPS, to talking on a cellphone, to adjusting the radio, to applying makeup, to simply talking to friends, which can lead to a fatal auto accident.  The campaign also includes a video of teens sharing the worst examples of distracted driving they have witnessed, and an online pledge against distracted driving that teens and their parents can sign.  Teens who sign the pledge are entered to win an IPAD – and they are entered again if they share the pledge with friends.

Likewise, a British public service announcement available on Youtube targets teenage drivers with a gruesome, realistic staging of a texting teen driver who crashes her car and kills two of her friends.  The U.S. Department of Transportation has also launched a website, www.distraction.gov, aimed at educating the public about the dangers of distracted driving.

We profoundly hope that these combined efforts will influence the public to drive safely and undistracted.  In the meantime, distracted drivers will continue to injure and kill themselves and others, to the tune of 1.6 million accidents in the United States each year.  Those injured by distracted driving should take legal action against those who injured them.  Perhaps the threat of civil liability, if nothing else, will convince American drivers to act responsibly.

For a free consultation with an experienced Chicago personal injury lawyer at Passen Law Group, call us at (312) 527-4500.

share save 171 16 Distracted Driving Leads to Injury and Wrongful Death