Posts Tagged ‘Chicago Injury Lawyer’

Tort Reform Properlty Remains Out of Health Care Bills

Wednesday, February 24th, 2010

As President Obama and fellow democrats went back to the drawing board once again concerning health care reform, conservatives representing the insurance lobby raised calls for tort reform.  Fortunately for the hundreds of thousands of Americans seriously injured or killed each year by preventable medical errors, our Chicago medical malpractice attorneys are pleased to report that the President, and the Congressional majority, has not backed down from its stance that damage caps in medical malpractice cases have no place in health care reform legislation.

Proponents of tort reform say it will result in huge savings over the long haul. The Congressional Budget Office (CBO), that black hole of information, says savings from tort reform can be anywhere from $41 billion to $54 billion over a ten-year period.  Our Chicago medical malpractice lawyers note that this savings amounts to less than one percent of health care costs, at a time when overall health care costs are expected to increase by $2 trillion (with a “T”) in that same ten-year period.

So, tort reform may save Americans less than 1 percent of health care costs over a 10-year period.  But at what cost?  If doctors and medical providers have capped professional liability exposure, will that reduce the incentive to practice safer medicine?  How many more Americans will die or sustain catastrophic injuries caused by medical negligence as a result of capping liability exposure?  What is the cost in terms of damage to families whose lives have been ruined by preventable medical errors, who will not have the financial means to provide for themselves?

The CBO did not measure this cost.

Tort reform removes the ability for victims of negligence to lead as normal a life as possible while giving insurance companies a free pass to profit off the negligence of doctors, hospitals and other health care professionals.

Each Chicago medical malpractice attorney at Passen Law Group understands the devastating impact that medical malpractice can have on families.  Just as the Illinois Supreme Court recently held that damage caps are unconstitutional, we believe that any similar federal law is also unconstitutional.

There are specific factors that must be met in order to bring a medical malpractice case, and such cases also involve doctors, hospitals and insurance companies. The experienced Chicago injury lawyers of Passen Law have a thorough understanding of the factors, players and statutes of limitation.  We also understand that compensation must cover the costs of living with permanent disability, including past and future medical treatment, lost wages, loss of normal life, disfigurement, and past and future pain and suffering.

For a Free Consultation with a Chicago personal injury lawyer with Passen Law Group, call us at (312) 527-4500.

Commercial Drivers Prohibited From Using Cell Phones While Driving

Tuesday, February 2nd, 2010

truck driver distraction 300x199 Commercial Drivers Prohibited From Using Cell Phones While DrivingThis week, our Chicago injury lawyers will discuss various initiatives and issues relating to distracted driving — in particular, drivers distracted by cell phones, PDAs, handheld devices and other technology.  In recent months, an increased number of catastrophic motor vehicle accidents have been found to have been caused by drivers distracted by such devices.

The United States Department of Transportation issued new federal guidelines last week, banning commercial truck and bus drivers from using hand-held cell phones or texting while driving.  The ban is the latest step towards curbing the number of people seriously injured or killed in bus or truck accidents.  Illinois, along with 18 other states and the District of Columbia, have already enacted laws banning texting while driving.

Texting or otherwise using a cell phone while driving an automobile is dangerous; doing so while behind the wheel of a semi-tracker trailer or bus, which weigh several thousand pounds and which may contain several passengers, including children, poses an even greater danger.  Semi-trucks and buses are difficult to stop or maneuver quickly, and doing so may create additional dangers, such as jack knifes or roll-overs that can lead to catastrophic injury and death.

Accidents involving semi-tracker trailers and buses can lead to debilitating injuries and even death. Such catastrophic accidents can be caused by numerous factors, such as faulty parts or driver negligence. If you or a loved one has been seriously injured in an vehicle accident, contact the experienced Chicago truck accident attorneys of Passen Law Group today at (312) 527-4500 for a Free Consultation.

Texting while driving falls under the category known as “distracted driving,” which USDOT defines as “any non-driving activity a person engages in that has the potential to distract him or her from the primary task of driving and increase the risk of crashing.”  The USDOT lists three main types of distraction:

1.    Visual (i.e., taking eyes off road)
2.    Manual (i.e., removing hands from steering wheel)
3.    Cognitive (i.e., taking your mind off driving)

Distracted driving is not limited to using cell phones, or texting while driving. Actions that seem simple, almost commonplace, like changing the radio station or taking a sip of coffee from a travel mug, are also examples of distracted driving which may contribute to a deadly car crash.

The new federal guidelines take effect immediately, and apply to trucks that weigh over 10,000 pounds and to interstate buses that carry more than eight passengers. Violators are subject to a fine up to $2,750.  For any questions, call a Chicago personal injury lawyer at Passen Law Group at (312) 527-4500.

Winter Slip & Fall Liability for Illinois Property Owners

Thursday, January 21st, 2010

Chicago in the winter gives rise to an increased number of slip and fall injuries, sometimes resulting in permanent injury or even death.  A general issue our Chicago personal injury lawyers are often asked by prospective clients is under what circumstances are business owners or other private or public entities liable in serious slip and fall accidents.

In Chicago, the city enacted section 10-8-180 of the Chicago Municipal Code, which states that, in general, “every owner, lessee, tenant, occupant or other person having charge of any building or lot of ground in the city abutting upon any public way or public place shall remove the snow and ice from the sidewalk in front of such building or lot of ground.” In other words, people are generally charged with the responsibility to shovel and remove ice or snow from the section of sidewalk in front of their home or business.

However, the questions posed to our Chicago premises liability attorneys becomes  (1) what are the repercussions for failing to remove ice/snow; and, (2) what are the repercussions for removing ice/snow in a negligent manner?  The ordinance appears to address only the first question.

Section 10-8-190 states that “any person, who removes snow or ice from the public sidewalk or street, shall not, as a result of his acts or omissions in such removal, be liable for civil damages.” In other words, the Chicago ordinance suggests that a business or property owner may be considered negligent for failing to shovel, salt or remove ice from the sidewalk, but not for removing snow/ice in a careless manner.

More generally, Illinois follows the “natural accumulation” rule (codified in the Snow and Ice Removal Act, 745 ILCS 75/2 (2006)) for slip and fall accidents, which states that a property owner has no duty to remove a natural accumulation of snow or ice from property.  However, a property owner may be held liable for a “voluntarily undertaking” to remove ice and snow, and doing so in a negligent manner.  Or, a property owner may also be held liable for slips and falls on an “unnatural accumulation” of ice or snow (often caused by the negligent snow/ice removal).  or slip an unnatural accumulation of snow or ice or aggravates a natural condition.

Public entities are also generally subject to the natural accumulation rule under the Governmental Tort Immunity Act, 745 ILCS 10/3-102 -105(a) (2008), which provides that  public entities owe a duty of ordinary care in the maintenance of its property, but is not liable “for an injury caused by the effect of weather” on public property.
It is oftentimes difficult to determine whether a person slipped and fell on a “natural” or “unnatural” accumulation of ice and snow, as noted by various Illinois courts.  Because of the general duty of landowners to maintain their property in a reasonably safe manner, Illinois courts oftentimes deny summary judgment to defendants on this basis, and allow a jury to decide the issue of natural or unnatural accumulation of ice or snow.

There are various other issues that are important to flesh out in slip and fall or other premises liability cases, including “notice” of the dangerous condition, including the length of time the dangerous condition existed and prior complaints to the defendant property owners.

If you have been seriously and permanently injured in a slip & fall or other accident that you believe was caused by the carelessness or recklessness of another individual or entity, call (312) 527-4500 for a Free Consultation with one of Passen Law Group’s top-rated Chicago injury attorneys.