Posts Tagged ‘Chicago Personal Injury Lawyers’

IL Medical Malpractice Vote May Cost Judge His Job

Tuesday, July 20th, 2010

As experienced medical malpractice attorneys practicing predominately in Illinois, we breathed a collective sigh of relief when the Illinois Supreme Court recently struck down as unconstitutional, once again, legislation that capped the amount of damages recoverable in medical malpractice cases.  Unfortunately, one of the judges responsible for that opinion, Thomas L. Kilbride, now faces a challenge from various pro-business/pro-insurance lobbiests in his retention campaign.  Judge Kilbride of the 3rd Judicial District is up for retention in November and must receive 60 percent of the vote to stay on the court.

As noted in Friday’s headline story of the Chicago Daily Law Bulletin, Judge Kilbride, who was elected in 2000, and who is one of four Illinois Supreme Court justices up for retention this year, is facing attacks from several pro-business special interest groups.  He has been the target of groups like the Illinois Chamber of Commerce, the Illinois Medical Society, and the Illinois Civil Justice League.  The focus of such attacks have been the court’s recent decision in Lebron v. Gottlieb Memorial Hospital that declared caps on medical malpractice awards unconstitutional.

Experts believe these pro-business and pro-medical interest groups will spend large amounts of money to deny Judge Kilbride’s re-election.  No Illinois Supreme Court justice has ever not been retained in a re-election campaign.

Our Chicago medical malpractice attorneys question whether judges should be appointed to the court through popular election in the first place.  Most voters, even experienced attorneys, place their vote on election day without any information concerning the experience and competency of the judges they are asked to elect.  Shouldn’t our judges in Illinois, like federal court judges and like judges in most states, be appointed under a merit-based system and after being thoroughly vetted by those most knowledgeable about the candidate’s background and experience?

Well, that’s besides the point for purposes of Judge Kilbride’s re-election campaign.  The more important question is the role of politics in the judiciary.  Judges, especially judges on the state’s highest court, should be charged with upholding the constitution, notwithstanding political repercussions for their decision.  In Lebron, the Court held, just as it had several years ago in the Best decision, that the state’s attempts at taking the right to award damages in medical malpractice cases away from a jury violated the constitution.  Now, because that decision may be contrary to popular opinion — based upon the millions of dollars spent by the insurance lobby and other powerful pro-business interest groups spreading misinformation — it may cost Judge Kilbride his job.

Passen Law Group’s top-rated Chicago personal injury lawyers will continue to fight for individuals and families to have their rights protected and their voices heard, even in the face of powerful interests who would like nothing more than to silence them.

For a free consultation with a top-rated personal injury or medical malpractice lawyer with Passen Law Group, call us at 312-527-4500.

share save 171 16 IL Medical Malpractice Vote May Cost Judge His Job

Trucking Accident Cases Require an Experienced Attorney

Tuesday, April 27th, 2010

Chicago truck accident attorneys 300x201 Trucking Accident Cases Require an Experienced AttorneyMany people, including attorneys, do not fully understand what is required to prosecute and try a trucking accident case.  These cases, while sharing basic similarities with auto accident cases, are in fact a very different breed.  They require special knowledge of the trucking industry, the players involved, and the various state and federal laws and regulations at issue, because in fact there are many hurdles particular to only trucking cases.  The Chicago truck accident attorneys at Passen Law Group have handled many catastrophic trucking cases, and apply the collective experience they have developed to each and every trucking case they handle.

The very first hurdle in a trucking accident case is one of perception.  The attorneys representing truck drivers and trucking companies attempt, naturally, to color the perception of the judge and jury.  These attorneys will try to make the judge and jury believe that a truck accident is just another auto accident.  Experienced trucking accident lawyers, however, know that a truck accident — often involving tractor-trailer trucks weighing several tons and sometimes hauling dangerous material –  is qualitatively different from a typical auto accident, and know how to explain those differences to a judge and jury.

Many different types of issues are different in a trucking case.  First and foremost, there are many different laws which apply to trucking accident cases which simply do not apply in a basic auto accident case.  This includes the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Regulations (FMCSR), which aim to prevent accidents caused by things like driver fatigue and substance abuse.  These regulations are written as duties of the drivers, but under the law it is the duty of the trucking company to ensure that its drivers comply.  The FMCSR also set forth the procedures that must be followed when companies hire truck drivers, in an attempt to prevent accidents caused by negligent hiring.  The International Fuel Tax Agreement (IFTA) also often is at issue in trucking accident cases.  The IFTA requires detailed records of fuel receipts, which can help a knowledgeable truck accident lawyer reconstruct a driver’s history, and determine whether he was in fact complying with the FMCSR and getting the required amounts of rest.

Another unique challenge in trucking accident cases is that there is a unique vocabulary that does not apply anywhere else.  From the types of communications used to the regulatory terms and business terms of the industry, the language surrounding truck accident cases can sound foreign to an inexperienced attorney.  Our top Chicago truck accident attorneys, however, speak that language, and can help victims and jurors understand what is really at issue.

There are also procedural steps that are crucial in trucking accident cases, but which are not common in other types of injury and accident cases.  For example, it is very important to promptly obtain a protective order or TRO  (temporary restraining order) to have the truck responsible for the accident impounded.  The truck itself, as well as the accident scene, provide crucial evidence of who was at fault for the accident – and once that evidence is gone, it cannot be recreated.  In order to inspect the truck, however, an attorney will generally need permission from the police, who are conducting their own criminal investigation into the crash.  An experienced truck crash lawyer will seek an order from the court allowing him to inspect the truck, as well as the logs, data, and other documents in the truck, as soon as the police have completed their own inspection.

Another key distinction in trucking accident cases is the types of evidence available.  Automobiles do not have “black box” recorders – but, trucks do.  The data from a truck’s black box is crucial in a trucking case – and often must be obtained before the truck is moved in order to prevent data loss.  This data should be obtained with both sides present (i.e., a representative of the trucking company, as well as the victim’s attorney), so that the data cannot be questioned later, and perhaps barred from the case.  Moreover, driver’s logs must be promptly obtained to prevent their destruction – many trucking companies routinely destroy this information six months after it is logged.  Additionally, some evidence may still exist with a company’s tax department even after this destruction – but many companies will not search for and produce this information unless specifically directed to do so.  The experienced truck accident attorneys of Passen Law Group know how to obtain this and other evidence to ensure that victims have the best chance of recovery.

For a free consultation with an experienced Chicago personal injury lawyer at Passen Law Group, call us at (312) 527-4500.

share save 171 16 Trucking Accident Cases Require an Experienced Attorney

KY Truck Accident Highlights Continuing Problems with Trucking Safety

Saturday, March 27th, 2010

Kentucky Truck Van Crash KY Truck Accident Highlights Continuing Problems with Trucking SafetyAs Chicago personal injury lawyers with substantial experience handling trucking accident cases, we are familiar with the devastation caused by crashes involving tractor-trailer trucks.  Yesterday was a brutal example of  such devastation.  A trucking accident in Kentucky claimed the lives of at least eleven people and injured many more.  The accident, which happened just before 5:30 this morning, reportedly occurred when a tractor-trailer crossed over the interstate’s median and hit an eighteen-passenger church van carrying Mennonite passengers, including children.  The truck then struck a rock wall and burst into flames.  The casualties included the driver of the truck, as well as others.  One of those killed was an infant, but two children, four and five years old, survived the crash without serious injury.

We do not yet know the extent or type of injury to the other passengers, but it is probably that they sustained traumatic brain injuries, among other internal injuries.  Some studies have found that up to 28% of all traumatic brain injuries are caused by motor vehicle accidents.  This month, our top Chicago brain injury lawyers have been exploring the types and causes of brain injury in connection with Brain Injury Awareness Month.  For more information about our top-rated brain injury and wrongful death practice, feel free to read this month’s articles or contact us directly at  (312) 527-4500.

Yesterday”s accident occurred on Kentucky’s section of Interstate 65, North of Bowling Green.  The tractor-trailer truck involved was heading South, but struck the van after crossing over to the northbound freeway.  The section of highway where the crash occurred is problematic, as the southbound traffic narrows from three lanes to two.  Traffic at times becomes congested or forms a bottleneck at that point, and a county official speculated that the truck may not have seen the situation, or slowed down to address it.  A deputy coroner also stated that the truck driver likely fell asleep at the wheel, leading to the accident.

While there is no definitive word yet on what caused the accident, there are a number of possibilities, unfortunately common in these types of accidents.  As was suggested, and especially in light of the hour at which the accident occurred, the truck driver may have fallen asleep at the wheel.  Many such accidents are caused by an overtired driver who has been behind the wheel for too many hours, in violation of Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) regulations (as a general rule, federal regulations do not allow more than eleven hours of consecutive driving, although there are other rules that also affect the number of hours an individual may drive).  In yesterday’s crash, this is made more likely by the fact that the driver’s truck had reportedly been broken down in Michigan for three days, and was fixed before he departed on this trip.  He may thus have been pushing the envelope to make up for lost time – a tactic that endangers drivers and others on the road.

If this or any truck accident was the result of negligence, the innocent victims may have a  cause of action against the truck driver, the trucking company employer and others.  This is true as to both the survivors, who may have a cause of action for their injuries, and as to those who were killed, whose estates may have a cause of action for wrongful death.  Our Chicago wrongful death lawyers, sadly, have seen many cases arising from such accidents.

Depending on the circumstances surrounding the crash, the victims may have a cause of action not only against the truck driver’s estate, but also against the trucking company that employed him.  The trucking company can be held responsible for the negligent actions of its employees through respondeat superior, a legal concept often called the “master-servant rule,” through which employers are made liable for the actions of their employees.  Additionally, if a trucking company had reason to know that  a driver could be dangerous at the time they hired him, the company can be liable for its own negligence in the hiring process (or for continuing to employ the driver after warning signs emerged).  If the truck driver was, indeed, in violation of FMCSA’s hours of service requirements, there is the potential for punitive damages, in addition to compensatory damages (medical expenses, wage loss, loss o normal life, pain and suffering, etc.).  One other possible wrinkle in today’s crash is that the truck was repaired just before this trip.  Often, negligently performed repairs or maintenance can lead to trucking accidents, and the victims in those cases may also have a cause of action against those who performed the repairs.

Exactly who is responsible to the victims is a question that can only be answered by a thorough investigation of the facts by a knowledgeable professional.  Our Chicago truck accident lawyers understand the need to fully explore the circumstances surrounding a trucking accident, to ensure that victims receive full compensation for their injuries from those who caused them.  We have decades of experience handling truck accident cases, and have obtained multi-million dollar verdicts and settlements on behalf of those injured.

To speak with an experienced Chicago truck accident attorney at Passen Law Group, call us at (312) 527-4500 for a Free Case Evaluation.

share save 171 16 KY Truck Accident Highlights Continuing Problems with Trucking Safety