Posts Tagged ‘Chicago Train Accident Lawyers’

Recent Deadly Chicago-Area Train Accidents

Friday, December 11th, 2009

Chciago train crash 300x225 Recent Deadly Chicago Area Train AccidentsAccording to news reports, yesterday there were two separate train accidents in the Chicagoland area:  one was a vehicle-train crash, the other was a pedestrian-train accident.  Unfortunately, both train accidents were deadly.  To speak with a top Chicago train accident lawyer, call Passen Law Group at (312) 527-4500 for a Free Consultation.

The news reports state that the vehicle-train collision occurred in Bensenvile at around 6:00 pm on Thursday.  A Metra train crashed into an SUV that was stopped on tracks with a husband and wife inside.  According to officials, as the train approached, the wife was able to get safely out of the vehicle, but the man was inside the SUV upon impact with the Metra train.  The man was killed in the accident.

The second deadly train accident involving a pedestrian occurred in Lake Forest.  An Amtrak train slammed into a pedestrian who was  walking the tracks.  It is unclear whether the pedestrian was crossing at a crosswalk, or was simply walking along the tracks at the time of impact.  According to the Lake County coroner, the victim was a 49-year-old woman.

Due to the size, weight, speed, and number of passengers involved in railroad transportation, accidents involving trains can be catastrophic.  Deadly train accidents may be caused by a number of factors including driver (conductor) error, product malfunctions or defects, or failure to follow appropriate policies or procedures.  To speak with one of our Chicago train injury lawyers, call us at (312) 527-4500 for a Free Consultation.

share save 171 16 Recent Deadly Chicago Area Train Accidents

Illinois Common Carrier Liability for Train and Bus Accidents

Wednesday, July 8th, 2009

Chicago public transportation liability 300x225 Illinois Common Carrier Liability for Train and Bus AccidentsFrom January to April 2009, the Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) has recorded 587 “train accidents” and 672 “highway-rail incidents”.

The FRA defines a train accident as “an event involving ontrack rail equipment that results in monetary damage to the equipment and track above a certain threshold.” This would include a train derailment, such as the recent train derailment in D.C., in which nine people were killed and over 70 people injured. Similar train derailments have occurred in Chicago, involving the Metra or the CTA.

The FRA defines a highway-rail incident as “any impact between a rail and a highway user at a crossing site, regardless of severity. Includes motor vehicles and other highway/roadway/sidewalk users at both public and private crossings.” Highway-rail incidents account for 96.7% of all fatalities.

If you or a loved one has been severely injured as a result of a train or highway-rail accident in Illinois, it is important to contact an experienced Illinois train accident lawyer. The train, bus or other vehicle may be considered a common carrier, and thus subject to state common carrier laws.

By definition, a common carrier is “a business that transports people, goods, or services and offers its services to the general public under license or authority provided by a regulatory body.” Common carriers in Illinois include the Chicago Transit Authority (CTA), Metra, Pace bus, and other forms of public transportation. Common carriers are different from private carriers, or those hired for one specific duty, such as a moving company.

Common carriers in Illinois are subject to the Common Carrier Liability Act (740 ILCS 25/), which holds the carriers to strict safety standards, and imposes a duty to provide the highest degree of safety for its passengers. The Common Carrier Liability Act states that “whenever any property is received by a common carrier, to be transported from one place to another, within or without this state, it shall not be lawful for such carrier to limit his common law liability,” which is to provide the highest degree of safety for its passengers.

In other words, common carriers such as the CTA and Metra have a duty to provide a higher degree of care for passenger safety and well-being, more so than private drivers and transportation companies. This duty applies not only to the transportation of passengers, but also to equipment maintenance and hiring standards. Failure to adhere to that duty can be considered negligence.

Such negligence can contribute, or result in catastrophic personal injury and wrongful death, so it is important to have a Chicago lawyer with success in train or bus accident cases handle your case.

share save 171 16 Illinois Common Carrier Liability for Train and Bus Accidents

Federal Judge in Illinois Limits Scope of ‘Patient Dumping’ Claims

Thursday, April 9th, 2009

er triage lawyer 300x210 Federal Judge in Illinois Limits Scope of Patient Dumping ClaimsA federal district court judge for the Northern District of Illinois held that a woman who suffered a miscarriage after waiting in an emergency room at Sherman Hospital for 90 minutes to see a doctor could not seek recourse under a federal statute barring “patient dumping.”  However, the judge stressed that the plaintiff may still have a viable negligence or medical malpractice claim under Illinois law against the emergency room personnel for misdiagnosis of plaintiff’s condition when she presented to the hospital complaining of severe abdominal pains.

Congress enacted the Emergency Medical Treatment and Active Labor Act (“EMTALA”) to prevent “patient dumping”, the practice of hospitals and medical professionals refusing to treat patients who are unable to pay.  See McCullum v. Silver Cross Hospital, 2001 WL 1516731 (N.D. ILL. Nov. 28,2001).  Here, the court rejected the plaintiff’s argument that emergency room personnel violated the anti-dumping statute by failing to appropriately screen the plaintiff when she first arrived at the hospital.

Specifically, the court found that a negligent or deficient medical screen does not violate EMTALA.  In this case, the hospital followed its “standard screening procedures,” which included the plaintiff being “triaged” within 10 minutes of her arrival at the hospital.  The nurse determined that the plaintiff was an “urgent” patient, defined as someone who required care but could wait up to two hours without suffering serious harm.

Whether or not the medical screening in this case was negligent is more suited for a medical malpractice action under Illinois law, rather than a cause of action under EMTALA.

share save 171 16 Federal Judge in Illinois Limits Scope of Patient Dumping Claims