Posts Tagged ‘Chicago Truck Accident Lawyer’

Government Still Ignoring Medically Unqualified Commercial Drivers

Friday, October 8th, 2010

Our Chicago truck accident attorneys have long been concerned about the number of medically unqualified commercial drivers on the roads today, and the governments utter failure to correct the problem.  Now, a recent analysis by News21 (a collegiate journalism group) looked at the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) Crash Statistics database, and found that from 2002 to 2008, medically unqualified and fatigued drivers were responsible for at least 826 fatal crashes.

Fatigued drivers were included because sleep apnea can cause drivers to fall asleep at the wheel, so truck accidents caused by driver fatigue are often rooted in a driver’s medical condition.  The FMCSA estimates that a staggering 36% of commercial drivers suffer from sleep apnea – a condition which, even when caught by a medical examiner, does not necessarily disqualify the driver.  Thus, there is no way to say exactly how many of the accidents attributed to fatigue, itself a serious problem in the trucking industry, are in fact medically related.  Our Chicago truck accident attorneys, however, have seen enough crashes to know how serious and pervasive the problem has become.

So how, exactly, are these drivers getting medical clearance?

Much of the problem lies in our nations piecemeal medical records system.  Although our attorneys have expressed our reservations and concerns with a wholesale online medical database, in the case of commercial drivers it is absolutely essential that such a system be put in place.  And the practitioners conducting the exams must themselves be better regulated:  as it now stands, drivers often obtain twenty-minute “medical exams” at rundown clinics that have sprung up at truckstops nationwide.  These clinics know their job – to certify the driver – and often overlook medical problems, such as existing conditions or poor eyesight, that should disqualify a driver.

Another aspect of the problem is that any medical practitioner – not just doctors of medicine (M.D.’s or D.O.’s) – can issue a medical card for a commercial driver.  This includes (among others) chiropractors, certain nurses, physician assistants and osteopathologists.  Many of these individuals are certainly not qualified to conduct a full medical exam and determine whether a driver is fit for the road.  In addition, there are no training requirements for these practitioners, and nearly no requirements as to what they must look at before issuing a medical certification.

And there is no requirement that the practitioner conducting the exam have ever seen the driver before, or make any effort to obtain the records of those who have.  The practitioners are thus forced to – or even willing to – rely solely on the health history as presented by the driver.  And should one of these practitioners actually deny a medical certification, there is no reporting system to record that denial.  This leaves the driver free to drive on down the road to the next state, town, or truck stop, and simply try again with less open disclosures or a less exacting examiner.

And notwithstanding this lax certification system, many of these drivers are not getting certified at all.  In the past five years, 902,416 citations were written for drivers who, when stopped, could not provide a medical certification.  This figure represents a shocking 15% of all commercial driver citations written at roadside checks nationwide during this period.

And those who are caught are often released with only a slap on the wrist.  There are tighter standards for commercial drivers driving passenger vehicles (such as buses).  Such drivers, when caught without a medical certification, have their vehicles held at the scene until proof of certification  is provided, or a certified driver arrives.

But other commercial drivers, such as truckdrivers, are simply issued a citation for a fine and sent on their way.  It is thus no surprise to our experienced trucking accident attorneys that these unqualified drivers are responsible for so many injuries and deaths.  If you or a loved one has been seriously injured or killed in a trucking accident, it is important to talk to an attorney experienced with truck accident cases, such as the lawyers of Passen Law Group.  Such an attorney will dig deep in his or her investigation on your behalf, and will be sure to check all possible causes for the crash, including medical certification, compliance with regulations, and others.

In spite of all the problems, and the rising death toll, federal regulators have failed to act to protect the public from medically unqualified drivers.  Since 2002, when it first issued a recommendation on the issue, the National Transportation Safety Board has been actively lobbying the FMSCA (a branch of the federal Department of Transportation) to put in place procedures adequate to keep unqualified drivers off the roads.  Yet, other than a few minor changes, FMSCA has taken no action on the problem.  As NTSB medical officer Mitch Garber stated, “It’s no more difficult for a medically unqualified driver to drive today than when the recommendation was made.”  Our Chicago trucking accident lawyers join our voice to that of the NTSB and urge our federal regulators to take this problem seriously.  Many, many lives are at stake.

There are plenty of great truck drivers and trucking companies out there who take this problem seriously.  However, it only takes one driver, trucking company or medical practitioner to ignore the medical background of a commercial truck driver, which may contribute to catastrophic accidents on our nation’s roadways.

For a free consultation with an experienced Chicago truck accident lawyer at Passen Law Group, call us at (312) 527-4500.

ATA Targets Unreasonable Trucking Accountability Rules

Sunday, October 3rd, 2010

The Chicago trucking accident attorneys of Passen Law Group take a keen interest in the regulations, rules, and policies of the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA), the agency largely responsible for regulating the trucking industry.  So too, naturally, does the American Trucking Association, an organization devoted to representing the industry.  Lately, there have been reports of an unusual level of friction between the two.

The ATA is reportedly generally happy with the FMCSA Rules.  The group has likewise been pleased with the 2010 updates to those rules, with one exception:  the ATA continues to target the agency’s crash accountability methodology and rules.

The ATA has been pressing the FMCSA to make changes to its crash accountability rules for several years.  Specifically, the ATA would like to see accountability determinations made before crashes are entered by the agency, and thus used in the 2010 Comprehensive Safety Analysis (CSA) and Safety Measurement System (SMS).  The ATA would also like to see specific types of crashes excluded from entry and use in the system, such as:

•    documented suicides;
•    crashes involving a car driving in the wrong direction;
•    crashes where a truck is rear-ended while stopped at a red light; and
•    crashes where a truck is struck while legally parked on a roadside.

In other words, certain types of truck accidents not caused by the fault of the truck driver or trucking company.  But the 2010 updates to the FMCSA rules again did not include the requested changes.  Dave Osiecki, the ATA’s senior vice president of policy and regulatory affairs, has thus sent a letter to FMCSA Administrator Anne Ferro asking the agency to provide ATA with the proposed timeline for making the necessary changes to the crash accountability system.

The Chicago truck accident attorneys of Passen Law Group are for increased crash accountability.  But in this case, the modifications requested by the ATA to agency policy are more than reasonable – they are necessary.  The types of crashes identified by the ATA are, without question, not the fault of the individual truck driver or the trucking company that employs him.  It is thus fundamentally unfair to include these crashes in the crash accountability data — statistics that are supposed to show how well large commercial motor vehicle carriers and drivers are complying with safety rules.

As Osieki stated, “It’s reasonable and appropriate, in ATA’s view, to suggest that the commercial driver and carrier involved in each of these types of crashes should be presumed to have no accountability in the crash and, therefore, removal of such crashes should be a matter of agency policy.”

Moreover, including these crashes in the safety data and the crash accountability system harms the public.  It is to no one’s benefit to have data that misstates the number or distribution of trucking accidents.  The government, and the private enforcers of trucking safety – namely civil attorneys such as the truck accident attorneys of Passen Law Group – must have accurate, reliable data in order to serve its intended purpose.

For example, if these accidents continue to be included in the crash accountability data, then the government’s resources may be committed towards the wrong carriers.  This would have the effect of leaving the carriers who in fact have the worst records free from appropriate FMCSA scrutiny.  We urge the FMSCA to promptly respond to the ATA’s letter, and to make the necessary and appropriate changes to the crash accountability program – for all our sake and safety.

For a free consultation with an experienced Chicago truck accident lawyer at Passen Law Group, call us at (312) 527-4500.

Distracted Trucking: Major Highway Danger

Thursday, July 15th, 2010

texting while trucking 300x210 Distracted Trucking: Major Highway DangerOur Chicago truck accident attorneys have often explored the dangers of distracted driving.  But distracted driving is not confined to the drivers of cars.  It turns out that truckdrivers, who carry the awesome responsibility of driving machines capable of killing large numbers of people when mishandled, have been engaging in distracted driving, as well.

This Fall, the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration finally began to take action on distracted truckdriving.  The FMCSA is close to issuing a rule banning texting while driving a truck.  The rule should be finalized this fall.  While we applaud the FMCSA for taking this action, our trucking accident attorneys are concerned that such a rule is necessary.  How anyone driving a large commercial tractor-trailer truck could think it is acceptable to text while doing so is unfathomable.  The fact is: distracted truckdrivers cause catastrophic motor vehicle accidents.

The FMCSA is also getting ready to propose a rule regarding cellphone use by truckdrivers, or at least certain commercial motor vehicle operators working in interstate commerce.  Again, while our truck accident attorneys are pleased to see the agency stepping up and exercising its rulemaking authority on this issue, the fact that it is required is highly troubling.  Moreover, the dangers of using cellphones while driving have been well known for years.  It is well past the time when governmental action on this issue was due.

Moreover, the proposed penalties for violating these rules are laughably low.  Texting while driving is perhaps the single most dangerous thing a driver can do – arguably even more dangerous than driving while under the influence of alcohol.  Yet the FMCSA’s proposed penalty for truck and bus drivers who violate the texting ban is a mere $2,750.  This “slap-on-the-wrist” penalty sends the clear message that the FMCSA still is not taking seriously the risks and possible consequences of distracted trucking.  Our Chicago truck accident lawyers doubt that such a low fine will have any meaningful effect on the behavior of drivers.

Next, the FMCSA will turn its attention to other distractions within the cab of large trucks.  The agency will consider such distractions as CB radios and dispatch systems, and attempt to come up with a rule that preserves truck drivers’ ability to communicate and receive necessary information, while still ensuring the safety of other motorists on the roads.  The problem is currently under study and consideration by the agency’s Motor Carrier Safety Advisory Committee, which will report on the results of its study in August.

With the federal regulators so slow to act, and so lenient when they do, motorists must rely on the general laws of each state to keep them safe.  However, only twenty-eight states currently ban texting while driving, and these are general laws, not anything specifically applicable to truck or bus drivers.  Moreover, the penalties for violating these state laws are all far lower than even the already inadequate $2,750 proposed for violating the new federal rule.

It is likely that the only effective check on distracted truckdriving will be lawsuits brought by those who are injured by the practice.  Sadly, this means that  innocent people must be injured or killed by distracted truckdrivers – and take action against those negligent drivers – before other truck drivers will be frightened into putting down their own smartphones.

That is why it is so important that those injured in trucking accidents fully investigate the causes of the accident, and take legal action if negligence was to blame.  The more victims stand up for themselves, the sooner the industry and its drivers will be scared into adopting safe practices on distracted truckdriving and other problem issues.  If you were injured in a trucking accident, an experienced truck accident lawyer can help you get to the bottom of what happened in your case, and help you decide whether you should take action, and against whom.

For a free consultation with an experienced Chicago truck accident attorney at Passen Law Group, call us at (312) 527-4500.

Chicago’s I-94 One of the Top Ten Deadliest Highways in America

Wednesday, July 7th, 2010

With the onset of the summer driving season, and the corresponding increase in crashes, data analysis website DailyBeast.com has now ranked the top 100 most dangerous interstates in the United States.  The analysis was based on data from the National Highway Safety Administration, covering the more than 50,000 fatal accidents occurring in the summers of 2004-2008.

Coming as little surprise to our top-rated Chicago truck accident attorneys, Illinois’s I-94 came in seventh on the list.  This position was based upon the road’s 89 fatalities stemming from 85 fatal crashes, across just under 62 in-state miles.  The highway thus had 1.38 fatal accidents per mile during the study period.

While our Chicago personal injury lawyers find this ranking distressing, there is good news as well.  While many other states had multiple highways on the list, no other Illinois roadway ranked in the top 100 most dangerous highways.  The only other Chicago-area road to make the list was Indiana’s I-65, a portion of which extends North to near the Chicago metropolitan area.  Indiana’s I-65 came in at #76, with 141 fatal accidents resulting in 157 fatalities, spread over about 261 miles of in-state road, or .54 fatal accidents per mile.

For a free consultation with an experienced Chicago car accident lawyer at Passen Law Group, call us at (312) 527-4500.

Trucking Companies Placing Short-Term Savings Before Public Safety?

Saturday, April 10th, 2010

trucking safety 300x209 Trucking Companies Placing Short Term Savings Before Public Safety?In light of the recent catastrophic tractor-trailer accident in Kentucky, our attorneys wanted to shed light on trucking safety generally.  The Chicago Tribune recently published an article on how America’s major trucking companies are dealing with the pressures of the recession, and the corresponding decline in shipping.  According to the report, the industry’s response to the recession is to refit older trucks that would otherwise be retired and replaced.  This is being done throughout the industry to avoid the cost of purchasing new trucks on the customary replacement schedule.

While the Tribune piece provided the relevant information about this trend from a purely business standpoint, what was lacking was any analysis of the effect on public safety.  The Chicago trucking accident attorneys of Passen Law Group, however, are extremely concerned that this short-sighted thinking will lead to a slew of avoidable accidents and injuries.

To counter the effects of the economic recession, trucking companies are “refitting” trucks that previously would have been replaced.  Instead of retiring a vehicle at around 400,000 miles, the trucking industry is now hoping to make these trucks last up to 1 million miles.  The implications for safety are obvious.

Although these older trucks are undergoing repairs and so-called “refitting,” at a cost of about $19,000, before returning to duty on America’s highways, much of the work is cosmetic or done to enhance the comforts of the driver, with no actual improvement to the safety of the truck.  For example, Navistar’s truck refitting includes new curtains for the sleeping cab behind the driver’s seat.

The Illinois truck accident lawyers of Passen Law Group commend the effort to improve the quality of life for America’s hardworking truckdrivers.  This is particularly true when the alterations to the trucks improve the chances that a driver will be well-rested during his driving hours.  According to the Federal Highway Administration, fatigue is the number one safety issue facing the trucking industry.  A recent study also revealed that driving while fatigued or drowsy increases crash risk by four to six times.  For these reasons, the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration will now require recorders in the trucks of those companies found deficient during on-site reviews, to ensure that drivers are not spending too much time behind the wheel.

The fact remains that these alterations, while commendable for other reasons, do nothing to enhance or restore the safety of these older trucks.  Our experienced truck accident lawyers know all too well the unspeakable damage that can be done when an unsafe vehicle is kept on the roads.  Far too many trucking accidents already occur due to the failure to perform repairs on aging truck components, or the negligent performance of those repairs when they are done.  For example, the recent fatal trucking accident in Kentucky involved a company with a safety rating that should have removed it from America’s highways entirely, and a truck that had been cited for safety problems six times since 2008 and indeed broke down and needed repairs immediately prior to the crash.  In light of this and other recent crashes, the decision to rely even more heavily on repair for vehicles that would ordinarily be withdrawn from service is troubling, to say the least.

This strategy is also shortsighted.  While extending the life of these vehicles may save money in the short-term, the damage that will be done could far outstrip those savings.  When drivers and others a re injured, disabled, or even killed by these older vehicles, the trucking companies must be called to account for this decision.  Should that occur, the top Chicago personal injury lawyers of Passen Law Group have the necessary experience to obtain justice for the victims of the trucking industry’s cost-cutting.  However, we at Passen Law Group sincerely hope that the trucking industry will return to a regular replacement routine before the damage is done – both to the companies’ long term financial interests and to the drivers and innocent motorists whose lives may be destroyed or lost.

For a free consultation with a top-rated Chicago truck accident lawyer at Passen Law Group, call us at (312) 527-4500.