Posts Tagged ‘Child Safety’

Child Safety in Autos and Air

Monday, February 14th, 2011

While severe injuries and deaths in automobile accidents are always tragic, there is perhaps nothing more disheartening than the loss of a young life – a child injured or killed in a crash.  This tragedy is only compounded when the injury or death of these innocent youngsters could have been avoided through the use of proper child safety seats and restraints.

With that in mind, the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) is devoting 2011 to a year-long effort to educate the public about child transportation safety, through a campaign designed to reach parents and other caregivers, state and federal regulatory agencies, and the transportation industry itself.  The campaign is focused on the need for proper child seats, booster seats, and child restraints.  As our experienced Chicago accident attorneys know, this simple precaution, so often ignored, is the single best and easiest way to protect children traveling in automobiles and airplanes.

The NTSB’s campaign includes a public forum, held at the close of last year, titled ‘Child Passenger Safety in the Air and in Automobiles.”  The forum was broadcast live via a webcast, which is still available to the public on the NTSB’s website, www.ntsb.gov/children.  Also available on the site are short videos on child passenger safety used during the forum, including a set of videos depicting a car accident that killed 4 children and severely injured two others, and a simulation of how the children would have been protected had they been properly secured in age-appropriate booster seats.

Likewise, the current campaign also focuses on the use of proper child restraints in airplanes.  At the end of last year, the Federal Department of Transportation’s Future of Aviation Advisory Committee (FAAC) presented 23 recommendations to DOT Secretary Ray LaHood.  Among those recommendations were several related to child airplane safety.

First, the FAAC recommended that Secretary LaHood utilize DOT resources to educate parents and the public about the dangers of holding a child on a parent’s lap while flying.  The Committee further recommended that the DOT update safety and economic data on child airplane passengers, and consider taking steps up to and including rulemaking in response to that data.

National Transportation Safety Board Chairman Deborah A. P. Hersman believes that these recommendations do not go far enough.  As she stated, “We appreciate the FAAC acknowledging the dangers associated with children flying on their parents’ laps, but we would have preferred to see the FAA be mandated to require that every person including our youngest children be restrained appropriately for their age and size.  We know that the safest place for children younger than age two traveling on airplanes is in an appropriate child safety seat. The era of the lap child on airplanes should come to an end.”

Our aviation crash attorneys applaud Chairman Hersman for her fierce advocacy for child airplane safety, and agree that the recommendations, while a good step, are inadequate.  While airplane crashes are infrequent, when they do occur the damage – particularly to young children – can be great.  Any inconvenience caused by the simple step of properly securing children in age-appropriate seats and harnesses is far outweighed by the safety benefit these seats confer.

The child injury attorneys of Passen Law Group wish the NTSB luck in its year-long child safety campaign.  We urge all parents and caregivers to view the Board’s videos before making decisions about car and air travel, and to take these simple steps to protect our nation’s children.

For a free consultation with an experienced Chicago injury attorney at Passen Law Group, call us at (312) 527-4500.

share save 171 16 Child Safety in Autos and Air

Companies Ask Congress to Put Profits Before Child Safety

Monday, December 20th, 2010

It is not often that individuals or businesses have the gall to ask our government to rollback or repeal legislation that cut children’s deaths in half.  But that is exactly what is currently going on in Congress, as legislators consider requests from toymakers and retailers to undo key legislation regarding lead and other toxic substances in children’s products.

The requirements at issue are a part of the Consumer Product Safety Improvement Act of 2008.  In 2008, prior to the enactment of the CPSIA, there were 172 recalls of children’s products due to the presence of lead and other toxic substances.  That same year, there were 24 related children’s deaths.  Then came the CPSIA.  In 2009, under the new law, the number of recalls was cut by two-thirds, to 50, and the number of deaths was cut in half:  only 12 children died.  Our Chicago child injury attorneys believe that the death of even one infant or child is too many.  But it is hard to argue with reforms that get such stunning results.

At least, we thought it was.

However, in the cold light of 2010, the effort has been launched to undo this important reform.  Why? Because the law’s requirements are supposedly too hard on business.  Indeed, those who advocate rolling back or repealing the CPSIA argue that if these child-safety measures are allowed to continue, small businesses will shut down.

So just what are the onerous requirements of the CPSIA?  Simply this:  The law establishes the ceiling on permissible amounts of lead in children’s products.  Every product marketed to children under 12 years of age must be tested to ensure that it does not contain lead above that level.  That test must be documented.  This includes all products marketed to this age range:  clothes, toys, sports gear, even children’s furniture.

These requirements seem eminently reasonable to the injury and wrongful death lawyers of Passen Law Group.  Even if they were marginally burdensome, that burden would surely be justified to ensure the safety of our children.

Yet even this is too much for the business community.  Even now, lobbying is underway to exempt huge categories of products – everything from bikes, to all sporting goods, to anything handmade – from CPSIA compliance.  Although various rationales are given, the fact remains: anything a child regularly plays with or is in contact with can be a danger if lead levels are too high, regardless of how it was made, where it comes from, or what type of product it is.  Our Chicago product liability attorneys vehemently oppose these efforts to weaken the protection that the CPSIA affords our children.

Unfortunately, even with the current CPSIA, children still are not safe from lead-tainted toys and products.  That’s why we at Passen Law Group support those who are striving not to weaken the CPSIA, but to enhance it.  Courageous legislators such as Senator Mark Pryor, (D)Arkansas, are leading the efforts to set even stricter ceilings for the amount of lead permitted in children’s products.  Moreover, Senator Pryor and his colleagues want to strengthen the force of the law by requiring that third parties perform  the lead testing and documentation, rather than allowing this task to be completed by the manufacturers and retailers themselves.

Although this measure is opposed by lobbyists and others representing the toy industry, the lives it could save are reason enough to support it.  Until the number of children’s deaths is reduced to zero, we simply must take every measure possible to force those who peddle goods to our children to actually ensure that those goods are safe.  This includes strengthening the CPSIA, and enforcing it through regulatory action and through lawsuits against those businesses who do not comply.  Only then will we see action by the manufacturers to truly make our children’s products safe.

If a child you love has been diagnosed with lead poisoning, we urge you to investigate and determine which products were responsible for the harm she has suffered.  An experienced personal injury attorney can help you with that investigation, and assist you in determining if you might have a claim against the manufacturers and retailers of the product that hurt your child.

For a free consultation with an experienced Chicago injury lawyer at Passen Law Group, call us at (312) 527-4500.

share save 171 16 Companies Ask Congress to Put Profits Before Child Safety

Companies Ask Congress to Put Profits Before Kids

Tuesday, December 14th, 2010

It is not often that individuals or businesses have the gall to ask our government to rollback or repeal legislation that cut children’s deaths in half.  But that is exactly what is currently going on in Congress, as discussed by our Chicago child injury lawyers, as legislators consider requests from toymakers and retailers to undo key legislation regarding lead and other toxic substances in children’s products.

The requirements at issue are a part of the Consumer Product Safety Improvement Act of 2008.  In 2008, prior to the enactment of the CPSIA, there were 172 recalls of children’s products due to the presence of lead and other toxic substances.  That same year, there were 24 related children’s deaths.  Then came the CPSIA.  In 2009, under the new law, the number of recalls was cut by two-thirds, to 50, and the number of deaths was cut in half:  only 12 children died.  Our Chicago accident attorneys believe that the death of even one infant or child is too many.  But it is hard to argue with reforms that get such stunning results.

At least, we thought it was.

However, in the cold light of 2010, the effort has been launched to undo this important reform.  Why? Because the law’s requirements are supposedly too hard on business.  Indeed, those who advocate rolling back or repealing the CPSIA argue that if these child-safety measures are allowed to continue, small businesses will shut down.

So just what are the onerous requirements of the CPSIA?  Simply this:  The law establishes the ceiling on permissible amounts of lead in children’s products.  Every product marketed to children under 12 years of age must be tested to ensure that it does not contain lead above that level.  That test must be documented.  This includes all products marketed to this age range:  clothes, toys, sports gear, even children’s furniture.

These requirements seem eminently reasonable to the experienced wrongful death lawyers of Passen Law Group.  Even if they were marginally burdensome, that burden would surely be justified to ensure the safety of our children.

Yet even this is too much for the business community.  Even now, lobbying is underway to exempt huge categories of products – everything from bikes, to all sporting goods, to anything handmade – from CPSIA compliance.  Although various rationales are given, the fact remains: anything a child regularly plays with or is in contact with can be a danger if lead levels are too high, regardless of how it was made, where it comes from, or what type of product it is.  Our Chicago products liability attorneys vehemently oppose these efforts to weaken the protection that the CPSIA affords our children.

Unfortunately, even with the current CPSIA, children still are not safe from lead-tainted toys and products.  That’s why we at Passen Law Group support those who are striving not to weaken the CPSIA, but to enhance it.  Courageous legislators such as Senator Mark Pryor, (D)Arkansas, are leading the efforts to set even stricter ceilings for the amount of lead permitted in children’s products.  Moreover, Senator Pryor and his colleagues want to strengthen the force of the law by requiring that third parties perform  the lead testing and documentation, rather than allowing this task to be completed by the manufacturers and retailers themselves.

Although this measure is opposed by lobbyists and others representing the toy industry, the lives it could save are reason enough to support it.  Until the number of children’s deaths is reduced to zero, we simply must take every measure possible to force those who peddle goods to our children to actually ensure that those goods are safe.  This includes strengthening the CPSIA, and enforcing it through regulatory action and through lawsuits against those businesses who do not comply.  Only then will we see action by the manufacturers to truly make our children’s products safe.

If a child you love has been diagnosed with lead poisoning, we urge you to investigate and determine which products were responsible for the harm she has suffered.  An experienced injury and wrongful death attorney can help you with that investigation, and assist you in determining if you might have a claim against the manufacturers and retailers of the product that hurt your child.

For a free consultation with an experienced Chicago injury and wrongful death lawyer at Passen Law Group, call us at (312) 527-4500.

share save 171 16 Companies Ask Congress to Put Profits Before Kids