Posts Tagged ‘Defective Product Injury’

Products Liability: A Primer

Thursday, August 11th, 2011

If someone is seriously injured or killed by a dangerous or defective product, there may be a viable action for product liability.

Broadly stated, a products liability claim is any legal claim which alleges that the victim was killed, injured, or otherwise suffered damages due to a product her or she purchased and used. Although every case is unique, generally speaking there are three types of products liability claims: defective manufacture, defective design, and failure to provide adequate warnings (or, in some cases, instructions).  Regardless of the type of products liability claim, the victim must demonstrate that the product was defective, that she suffered injury or damage, and that this defect caused her injuries or damages.

Defective Manufacture

This type of product liability action is well ingrained in the public consciousness. A claim for defective manufacture arises when there is some error or problem when the product is being made, leading to a flaw in a single product or a batch or batches of the product. But whatever the details, the product which injured the plaintiff is different from the products that are usually on the shelf.

Examples of defective manufacture include:

  • stroller with a crack in the frame, leading to collapse with a child inside
  • batch of pain killers (such as ibuprofen) tainted with a hazardous chemical
  • car or truck with missing brake pads
  • Plane crash due to negligently installed wing

In each case, not every customer who purchased the product or brand suffered any injury – only the customer who purchased the specific item with the defect.

Defective Design

The second type of products liability claim, a claim of defective design, is also well-recognized. In a defective design case, it is not one specific item which is defective, but the entire inventory. This is because defective design claims center on the design, composition, or plan for the product, which is then used to manufacture each one. In these claims, there is no problem in the manufacturing process – the product which caused the injury is made exactly as the manufacturer intends. Yet the product is still dangerous: something in the product is inherently dangerous.

Examples of defective design include:

  • model of vehicle which tends to roll over on sharp corners
  • brand of sunscreen that does not actually block UV rays
  • line of blenders that can electrocute the user when placed on a particular setting

Inadequate Warnings

The final broad category of product liability claims comes into play when a product is dangerous, usually in a way that is not immediately obvious, and the manufacturer fails to warn the customer about that danger. This can also be true if the danger can easily be avoided by taking a simple precaution, or using the product only in specified ways, and the manufacturer fails to provide this information to the customer.

Situations involving defective manufacture include:

  • electric tea kettle with a steam vent in an unusual location, with no warning on the package
  • Pharmaceutical drug with no warning label stating that it can be dangerous if taken in combination with certain allergy medications
  • cleaning product packaged without a warning that it can produce dangerous fumes if used in an enclosed space and not immediately rinsed

Practical Example

Any product could potentially give rise to any of these three types of claims. Take, for example, an outdoor playset. If the playset is designed so that children on the swings can swing backward and hit their head on the platform above and suffer a brain injury, a child injured in such an accident could have a defective design claim.

If, however, a particular playset was built using a rotted piece of wood on the platform, and that wood gives way under a child, causing him to fall and break his leg, then that child could have a defective manufacture claim.

Finally, if the playset comes with two slides, each with the same connector at the top, but if they are connected in the wrong places a child using the slide exits directly in the path of the swings, and the manufacturer provides no warning or instructions as to which slide goes where, then an injured child could have a claim for inadequate warnings (note that this could also give rise to a defective design claim).

Passen Law Group represents individuals and families in product liability actions in a variety of contexts, and with record results.  For a free consultation with an experienced Chicago products liability lawyer at Passen Law Group, call us at (312) 527-4500 or email info@passenlaw.com.

share save 171 16 Products Liability: A Primer

Link Between Cell Phone Usage and Brain Cancer?

Thursday, January 7th, 2010

In recent months, we have heard a lot about the dangers of using a cell phone while driving — due to the hundreds of serious car and truck accidents caused by distracted drivers.  Researchers have debatecell phone brain cancer radiation Link Between Cell Phone Usage and Brain Cancer?d whether another, more long-term danger of cell phone usage lurks:  brain cancer.

The issue of whether or not cell phones cause brain cancer has become a hotly debated topic. The mayor of San Francisco, California, recently proposed mandatory radiation labels on cell phones, and a senator from Maine proposed placing warnings on cell phone packaging, much like warnings found on cigarette packaging today.  On the other hand, as noted by our Chicago brain injury lawyers in an earlier blog post, there have been several studies debunking the theory that cell phone usage increases the risk of cancer.

For a Free Consultation with a Chicago-based injury and wrongful death attorney with experience representing individuals in cases involving the misdiagnosis or delayed diagnosis of cancer, or cancer caused by some other form of negligence, call Passen Law Group at (312) 527-4500.

Cell phones, like other electronic devices, emit a certain level of radiation. The radiation is “non-ionizing”, meaning it does not strip atoms and molecules from the tissue and alter chemical reactions in the body like ionizing radiation, or X-Rays.

Still, the United States limits the amount of radiation exposure of cell phones.  The radiation emission level of cell phones is measured according to the “specific absorption rate” or SAR, which the Cellular Telecommunications Industry Association defines as “a way of measuring the quantity of radio frequency (RF) energy” absorbed by the human body.  Both American and European governments have a set SAR limit: 1.6 watts per kilogram in the US, and 2 watts per kilogram in Europe.  Any cell phones that exceed the limits cannot be sold in the US or Europe.

Radiation from cell phones comes from the transmitter, and is emitted through the antenna.  Both parts are located near the top, or where a person places a cell phone to the ear in order to hear.  It is this close proximity to the brain that raises public concerns, and has prompted studies from the Cellular Telephone Industry Association, the American Journal of Epidemiology, the EM Radiation Research Trust, the Environmental Working Group and others.  So far, the studies concerning the link between cell phone usage and cancer have been either inconclusive or contradictory.

There is general consensus among the scientific community that more studies need to be conducted to better understand long term effects from exposure to cell phone radiation.  Although cell phones are omnipresent devices today, the technology itself has only been around for 20 years, and its widespread use is even more recent.  More time is required to assess long-term risks associated with cell phone radiation exposure.  Indeed, a far-reaching, government funded study must be conducted to ensure we are not seriously endangering the public.

At Passen Law Group, our Chicago personal injury lawyers are committed vigorously representing individuals and their families against powerful corporate interests and negligent or reckless individuals or entities.  To speak with one of our injury attorneys, call Passen Law Group today at (312) 527-4500 for a Free Consultation.

share save 171 16 Link Between Cell Phone Usage and Brain Cancer?