Posts Tagged ‘Hospital Negligence’

Chicago Hospitals Try Transparent Approach to Medical Malpractice

Tuesday, October 26th, 2010

Our medical malpractice attorneys in Chicago have frequently criticized the prevailing medical culture, which encourages doctors and hospitals to deny when medical errors are made, fighting even disclosures about what occurred in the hope of avoiding lawsuits and heightened scrutiny.  As we have often said, such irresponsible and callous conduct does not decrease lawsuits and liability.  To the contrary, such conduct often merely angers victims and their families and weakens the practice of medicine, making a prolonged conflict or a lawsuit more likely.

Recent research has confirmed our position.  A recent study by the University of Michigan Health System, Brigham and Women’s Hospital of Boston (funded by the Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan Foundation and published in the Annals of Internal Medicine) shows that medical malpractice claims can be greatly reduced when doctors and hospitals engage in proper conduct after a medical mistake had occurred.  In the study, doctors and staff members were encouraged to do the following after committing a medical error or otherwise engaging in medical malpractice:

•    tell the patient and/or his family that the error had occurred;
•    tell the patient and/or his family how the error was made and who made it;
•    tell the patient and/or his family what was being done to prevent the error from occurring again;
•    apologize sincerely to the patient and/or his family; and
•    offer to fairly compensate the patient and/or his family.

To non-medical professionals, these simple steps seem incredibly commonsense and basic.  Yet our Chicago medical malpractice lawyers know that they are rarely taken.  But, as the study demonstrated, when these simple protocols are followed, lawsuits and liability exposure declined – there were half as many medical malpractice lawsuits, nearly thirty percent fewer compensation claims, disputes were resolved faster, administrative and legal costs were reduced by an incredible sixty-one percent.

However, total compensation paid to victims declined, as well.  This may be because hospitals have secured settlements from medical malpractice victims before they have met with an experienced malpractice attorney, who can give the patient and his or her family an idea as to the value of the case.  Therefore, our fear is that hospitals will begin to use predatory tactics to settle with medical malpractice victims for pennies on the dollar, before they have had a chance to appreciate the significance of their injuries.

For better or worse, a similar protocol is spreading to the major Chicago hospitals.  The University of Illinois Medical Center in Chicago has developed a “seven pillars” approach to dealing with medical errors.  Much like the University of Michigan protocols, the seven pillars center around discovering and openly acknowledging medical errors, and then compensating victims and families promptly when appropriate.

Our medical malpractice attorneys applaud the University, its researchers and doctors, on their important and courageous first step.  Responsible and respectful protocols like the seven pillars approach are an important step towards restoring the confidence of the American people in our hospitals and physicians, and restoring the integrity of the medical profession.

The University has received a three-year, $3 million demonstration grant from the federal government’s Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality to implement the seven pillars approach at nine other Chicago-area hospitals.  The project will begin at five hospitals, expanding to four more after the first eighteen months.  Specifically, the researchers from the University will look at each of the hospitals to determine how implementing the project impacts the total number of medical errors, the number and seriousness of medical error claims made against the hospitals, and the total compensation and costs incurred by the hospitals related to medical errors.  They hope to publish the results in the next two years.

The University of Illinois Medical Center has naturally already implemented its own program, pre-grant.  In the time since implementation, the Center has identified 56 cases of medical error – 55 of which were settled out-of-court in accordance with the protocol.

The seven pillars project is among twenty grants for demonstration and planning projects nationwide.  These twenty grants contain a total of $25 million in federal funds, and are administered as part of the Department of Health and Human Services’ Patient Safety and Medical Liability Initiative.

For a free consultation with an experienced Chicago medical malpractice lawyer at Passen Law Group, call us at (312) 527-4500.

share save 171 16 Chicago Hospitals Try Transparent Approach to Medical Malpractice

States Move to Require Hospital Negligence Disclosures

Thursday, September 16th, 2010

Our Chicago medical malpractice attorneys have previously argued that hospitals must begin to “own up” to their medical mistakes – and that doing so actually decreases medical malpractice exposures.  Now, state legislatures have begun to take notice, and are moving towards requiring public acknowledgment and reporting of medical errors.

This trend appears to have arisen from an investigation by the Las Vegas Sun.  The newspaper looked at so-called “Sentinel” events, incidents at a hospital that cause injury or harm to patients, or the risk of injury or harm to patients.  These events had previously been reported and available to the public only as a state-wide figure, leaving patients completely unable to compare the history and record of various hospitals, and leaving the hospitals with no public accountability for preventable injuries and infections.

The Sun, however, used 2008 and 2009 hospital billing records to identify 969 such incidents in the Las Vegas area alone, as part of a total of 1,363 incidents of preventable harm.  Importantly, the newspaper was thus able to identify which hospitals were the source of these events.  During the same period, only 402 events were reported to state regulators – but because the figure has only been reported as a statewide total, there is no reasonable way for the paper to determine which hospitals have been violating their reporting duties.  Nevada state legislators have, however, launched an investigation.

Although there is every reason to believe that the problem of under-reporting is not confined to Las Vegas, naturally the Nevada Legislature was the first state to act on the Sun’s findings.  Last month, the Nevada legislature’s Committee on Health Care approved two draft bills aimed at requiring hospitals themselves to disclose what the press unearthed.  The new laws would require hospitals to report for public disclosure – by location – preventable hospital injuries and infections.  This legislation builds on a 2009 federal law on infection reporting which permitted, but did not require, states to report infection data by facility to the National Healthcare Safety Network (a branch of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention).

But Nevada is not alone in its efforts.  The Iowa Department of Inspections and Appeals is now moving to require similar disclosures of Sentinel events, called “never events” under Iowa law.

What we have not yet seen, however, is any similar action in Illinois.  Our Chicago medical malpractice attorneys urge the Illinois legislature to require similar disclosures.  Illinois patients and consumers, like those in Nevada and Iowa, deserve the opportunity to make informed decisions between available hospitals, and deserve the improved care that increased scrutiny will bring.  Requiring the public reporting and disclosure of incidents of preventable injury and infection at hospitals in our state can only increase the level of care provided to Illinois’ citizens, and decrease the need for medical malpractice actions to compensate the injured.

For a free consultation with an experienced Chicago medical malpractice lawyer at Passen Law Group, call us at (312) 527-4500.

share save 171 16 States Move to Require Hospital Negligence Disclosures

Proposed Health Care Reform Leaves Medical Malpractice Liability to States

Saturday, January 2nd, 2010

congress health care reform 300x168 Proposed Health Care Reform Leaves Medical Malpractice Liability to StatesThe nation breathed a sigh of relief as the Senate passed its version of the health care reform bill before the holiday break, bringing sweeping changes one step closer to reality.  Fortunately, for the sake of past and future victims of medical malpractice, the proposed national health care reform will not contain draconian “tort reform” measures.

Despite strong lobbying from the insurance industry, both the Senate and House versions of the health reform bills do not include damage caps for medical malpractice actions, or other severe forms of medical liability reform.  Instead, medical malpractice litigation is left to the individual states’ civil justice system, and the right for a jury to determine what is fair compensation on a case-by-case basis in medical malpractice lawsuits.

The Senate’s bill does provide money towards “state demonstration programs” aimed at evaluating  alternatives to the current system of medical tort litigation.  Our Chicago medical malpractice lawyers continue to place our faith in a jury of one’s peers to determine what is fair and reasonable compensation for victims of medical negligence.

Under the Senate’s bill, states wishing to set up such demonstration programs must meet specific criteria to receive funding, including:
•    Encouraging disclosure of health care errors
•    Encouraging collection and analysis of patient safety data related to health care disputes
•    Increasing availability of “prompt and fair resolution” of disputes
•    Allowing patients to “opt out or voluntarily withdraw” from the alternative program at any time

It remains to be seen  what, if any, medical liability reform measures will be included in the final bill sent to President Obama for his signature, including the nature of the “state demonstration program” effort. The hope of medical injury attorneys and their client victims is that any significant tort reform measures will remain absent, or will be more focused at addressing careless and reckless behavior of health care professionals, rather than limiting patient rights.

Medical errors can cause serious, permanent injury or death. Just because an injury occurred as a result of a medical procedure, however, does not mean that medical negligence occurred.  Specific criteria must be met in order for a medical malpractice case to be brought.  An experienced medical malpractice attorney can help you determine whether malpractice occurred and, if so, ensure you are compensated to the full extent permissible under the law.

For a Free Consultation with one of our top injury attorneys, call Passen Law Group today at (312) 527-4500.

share save 171 16 Proposed Health Care Reform Leaves Medical Malpractice Liability to States