Posts Tagged ‘medical malpractice lawyer’

Failure to Diagnose Breast Cancer

Friday, July 22nd, 2011

There are few things as frightening and overwhelming as receiving a cancer diagnosis from your physician. But, for many patients – particularly those with advanced cancers – the pain of this situation is compounded by wondering: could this have ended better, could I have been spared this pain and suffering, if my condition had been diagnosed sooner?

With breast cancer, as with many other cancers, early detection is absolutely essential to ensure the best chance of survival. As our experienced cancer misdiagnosis attorneys are all-too-well aware, the failure to diagnose breast cancer can lead to immeasurable suffering, unnecessary surgeries, and even death.

What Is Breast Cancer?

Breast cancer is, just as it sounds, a malignant growth in a victim’s breast tissue. Although most people associate breast cancer with women, men have breast tissue, as well, in smaller amounts, and can thus occasionally suffer from breast cancer, as well.

Breast cancer in women, however, is extremely common.  In fact, although studies vary, up to one in every seven American women will suffer from breast cancer at some point in life.

How Is Breast Cancer Discovered?

Breast cancer diagnoses, unlike those of many diseases, often originate from the patient herself. Physicians recommend that all adult women perform a breast self-examination at least once per month. When women perform these exams regularly, they can learn the consistency of their own breast tissue, and help detect any changes or lumps. Discharge from the nipple is another symptom which women often notice on their own.

Breast cancer can also be found following a medical examination.  Physicians and gynecologists should check  breasts at regular appointments. Additionally, women over 40 should also have mammograms on a regular basis. The failure to instruct a patient to obtain a mammogram appropriate for her age range or the failure to correctly read a mammogram can be a form of medical negligence.

How Is Breast Cancer Diagnosed?

A breast cancer diagnosis requires a follow-up examination, after the abnormality is observed. There are a number of tests that can be used for follow-up analysis of a woman’s condition.

One of the most common follow-up tests is a mammogram, or more detailed mammograms. Also common is a needle aspiration, in which a needle is inserted into the area in question, and used to obtain tissue, or drain fluids from the tissue for testing. Traditional biopsies are also used.

Although mammograms are useful, and extremely common, they are also risky. Some studies show that up to 80%, or 4 out of every 5, breast cancer patients, had a mammogram done of the area, which was incorrectly interpreted as non-cancerous. In addition to simple misreading of test results, some of these misreadings are the result of physical elements (such as particularly dense breast tissue). In those cases, the failure to recognize cancer (or order follow-up testing) may or may not be medical malpractice. Other misreadings are the result of technical problems with the mammogram equipment itself, which may be the result of either negligent maintenance or products liability.

More and more, physicians are recognizing the utility of using MRIs in breast cancer diagnosis. Some studies have shown that an MRI can detect up to 3% of those breast cancers which mammograms miss. But other studies have shown that, for certain types of breast cancer, mammograms detect only 56% of cases, while MRIs detect 92%. The standard of care is certainly evolving in this area. Our experienced medical malpractice attorneys believe that now, in at least some circumstances, the failure to use MRI screening or follow-up testing may amount to medical negligence.

Who Is at Risk?

Although all women are at risk to develop breast cancer, there are several particular risk factors. A woman is considered to have a high risk of breast cancer if she:

  • Has either the BRCA1 or BRCA2 gene mutation.
  • Has a family history of the BRCA1 or BRCA2 gene mutation, especially in a parent, child, or sibling.
  • Has a family history of breast or other cancers.
  • Has had radiation to the chest while she was between 10 and 30 years of age.
  • Has (or has a close relative with) Cowden syndrome, Li-Fraumeni syndrome, or Bannayan-Riley-Ruvalcaba syndrome.
  • Had an early onset of menstruation and puberty, or a late onset of menopause
  • Has never borne a child.

There is also research indicating that additional factors, such as a late age when first becoming pregnant, a first pregnancy which is not carried to term, or long-term use of oral contraceptives or estrogen, may put women at higher risk of developing breast cancer.

For women in these high-risk categories, physicians should be using ultrasounds, as well as mammograms. Ultrasounds can produce false positives – but are far less likely to miss active cancers. If you are in one of these high-risk categories and your physician is not employing ultrasound screening, ask why not. If are in one of these high-risk categories and your physician missed your breast cancer while failing to employ ultrasound screening, talk to an experienced medical malpractice attorney about whether you may have a claim.

Stephen M. Passen of Passen Law Group has over 30 years experience representing individuals and families in medical malpractice cases, including cases involving failure to timely diagnose breast cancer.  For a free consultation with Mr. Passen, call us at 312-527-4500, email info@passenlaw.com, or fill out a free case evaluation form on our website.

share save 171 16 Failure to Diagnose Breast Cancer

Failure to Diagnose Skin Cancer

Thursday, July 7th, 2011

In recent years, the mortality rate (i.e., the number of deaths) for many cancers has declined. Skin cancer is the exception to this trend: death from skin cancer is actually on the rise.  This is despite improved treatment options, and greater public awareness. The problem? The failure to diagnose skin cancer by inexperienced primary care physicians.

Accurate, early diagnosis is absolutely key in skin cancer treatment. The American Cancer Society has published data showing that when a patient has a small, localized cancerous lesion, there is a five-year survival rate of 98 percent. But as these lesions grow, and a malignant melanoma metastasizes, this prognosis strongly decreases. By the time the cancer has spread to the victim’s bones or organs, the survival rate is only 15 percent. Thus, the failure to diagnose skin cancer early, often a result of medical malpractice, can lead to the patient’s death.

Skin Cancer Incidence

Skin cancer is the single most common form of cancer in the United States, with roughly 1 million Americans diagnosed with skin cancer annually.

There are two principal types of skin cancer: melanoma and non-melanoma. Non-melanoma skin cancers are further divided into basal cell carcinomas and squamous cell carcinomas. Although only about 60,000 of the 1 million skin cancer cases in America each year are melanoma, this type of skin cancer accounts for a widely disproportionate number of skin cancer deaths.

Treatment

Skin cancer can be treated in various ways. First and foremost, the cancerous growth can be removed, through non-surgical excision or through surgery. For non-melanoma carcinomas, treatment can also include radiation or chemotherapy, either in the traditional fashion or administered topically, to only the affected area. With melanomas, treatment can include interferon, but radiation and chemotherapy generally cannot cure the cancer (although they may be able to delay its growth or spread).

Early Diagnosis is Key

So, what can be done to ensure that skin cancer is caught early enough for treatment?

Patients can help themselves by performing regular self-screening. Individuals should become familiar with the appearance of their skin, so that they can notice any changes, and can help their physician to catch any cancerous growths early.

And, as with many other cancers, an ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure. This is particularly true for those with skin cancer risk factors, such as a family or personal history of skin cancer, fair skin and/or freckles, Irish background, or outdoor jobs. These individuals should always wear sunscreen or UV-protected clothing, stay out of the sun whenever possible, and begin consistent self-screening at an early age.

These steps can help you to avoid becoming the victim of medical malpractice. But they do not relieve physicians of their responsibility to live up to the standard of care in diagnosing skin cancer early. Doctors absolutely must recommend further testing for any patient whose symptoms suggest even the slight possibility of skin cancer.

Symptoms

Although skin cancer can, on rare occasions, be symptomless, the symptoms of skin cancer include:

  • A new growth, particularly a mole or a pale bump
  • Changes to existing moles
  • A raised red bump
  • A scaly, irritated patch of skin with a reddish hue
  • Irregular growths (moles or other growths which are asymmetrical)
  • Bleeding of moles or raised areas on the skin

Skin Cancer Medical Malpractice

The most common form of medical malpractice involves the failure of dermatologists, pathologists, internists and other doctors to diagnose skin cancer given the patient’s symptoms.  Other examples of medical negligence include the failure to send a patient for additional testing, including pathology or a dermatology consult, which results in delayed diagnosis of skin cancer.   Additionally, a misdiagnosis of the type of skin cancer (mistaking a melanoma for a benign mole) is also a potential form of medical malpractice.

If you have any of the symptoms of skin cancer, or concerns about any growth on your skin, you should see a physician as soon as possible.

For a free consultation with an experienced Chicago cancer misdiagnosis lawyer at Passen Law Group, call us at (312) 527-4500.

share save 171 16 Failure to Diagnose Skin Cancer

AMA Uses Bad “Facts” to Support Bad Law – H.R. 5

Tuesday, June 7th, 2011

As we have previously noted, the leadership in the Federal House of Representatives has now moved to undo the recently-passed federal healthcare reform, and replace it with legislation designed solely to protect doctors and prevent the victims of medical malpractice from fully recovering for the harm they suffer. The American Medical Association has now come out in support of H.R. 5, in a published ad.  Our top medical malpractice attorneys join with the American Association for Justice in refuting both the AMA’s claims, and the falsified numbers used to support them.

The AMA’s ad is full of overblown hyperbole – the organization asserts that America’s medical liability system is “broken,” and contains much discussion of “frivolous” lawsuits.  Naturally, the AMA asserts that these lawsuits are responsible for rising healthcare costs.  As we have previously discussed, such claims are not only unfounded, they are directly contradicted by the actual evidence.

Perhaps that is why the AMA felt the need to invent statistics in support of its claims.

For example, the AMA’s add claims that 64 percent of medical liability claims in 2009 were dropped, withdrawn or dismissed, using this statistic to assert that the majority of medical malpractice lawsuits are “frivolous.”

But this analysis is flawed on many fronts.  Most notably, it confuses the term “claim” with an actual lawsuit.  A claim includes any demand made to an insurer for benefits under a policy. Thus, the 64 percent of “claims” which were dropped have nothing to do with medical malpractice, but with liability for payment of medical expenses – a very different form of medical liability.

When actual medical malpractice lawsuits are considered, a very different picture emerges.  In fact, between 1999 and 2008, medical malpractice lawsuits in the United States dropped by 15 percent, a significant reduction indeed.

Likewise, the AMA’s ad asserts that physician defendants won 88 percent of medical liability claims which went to trial in 2009. Again, the AMA argues that this proves that the vast majority of medical malpractice claims are “frivolous.”  That claim is completely unfounded.

In fact, only 3 percent of patents injured by medical negligence file a lawsuit at all.  This is in large part because so many instances of medical negligence are completely clear cut, and fall into oft-repeating patterns (infections from improper sanitization when inserting a catheter, for instance). Insurance companies settle the bulk of these claims, which then never reach trial at all.  This is not just rhetoric – no less than researchers at Harvard University have found that the refusal to pay well-founded malpractice claims is a far bigger problem than so-called “frivolous” claims.

The AMA’s financial “facts” are no better.  In the add, the Association asserts that H.R. 5 is necessary because many doctors pay $150,000 annually to insure against medical malpractice claims. Even were this figure accurate (it is not, and indeed, malpractice premiums have been lower each year since 2006), that has nothing to do with H.R. 5′s proposed draconian caps on damages payable to victims.

You see, as our personal injury attorneys have previously noted, there is already much real data on what happens when damages caps are put in place, as various states – including Illinois – have been experimenting with these caps for years.  What has occurred?  Damage caps do nothing to lower malpractice insurance premiums.  States without damages caps actually have lower insurance premiums, on average.

So why is the AMA so keen to support H.R. 5?  Because the bill would limit the liability of its members, pure and simple.  With H.R. 5′s nationwide damages cap in place, doctors who commit malpractice, and the companies who insure them, would face substantially reduced liability.  This would come at the expense of victims, who would be prevented from recovering for the harm done to them, and the public, who would be serviced by doctors with reduced incentive to work hard to ensure patient safety.

We urge our readers and our representatives to oppose this dangerous and ill-conceived legislation.  All our lives could depend upon it.

For a free consultation with a top-rated medical malpractice lawyer at Passen Law Group, call us at (312) 527-4500.

share save 171 16 AMA Uses Bad “Facts” to Support Bad Law   H.R. 5