Posts Tagged ‘Personal Injury’

New Laws Take Effect in Illinois

Friday, January 6th, 2012

On January 1, 2012, 214 new laws went into effect in the state of Illinois. Most laws are highly industry-specific, and will have no bearing on real people or the way they live their lives. But a few govern each of us directly. Others will have a direct impact on our comfort and safety, even if they do not require us to change our lies or behaviors.

For example, one new law modifies Illinois’ seatbelt rules. Now, all passengers riding in the backseat of a car in Illinois are required to wear seatbelts. Our experienced Chicago car accident attorneys know firsthand the safety benefit to seatbelt usage, and are glad to see our lawmakers recognize this important safety measure.

Likewise affecting the daily life of ordinary citizens is the new law, HB S860, allowing motorcyclists to run red lights, if they have stopped and waited a “reasonable” period for the light to change. Although this law may increase convenience for riders, expect an increase in motorcycle accidents as a result. Governor Quinn unsuccessfully attempted to veto this questionable new law (his veto was overridden).

Other new laws which may affect you include:

• Bus Driver Drug and Alcohol Testing: Under HB 147/PA 97-0466, non-CDL holder school bus drivers can be given drug and alcohol testing if there is a reasonable suspicion of use. Other specific testing changes bring state law in line with federal law.

• Commercial Driver’s License (CDL) Medical Requirements: HB 1295/PA 97-0208 again brings Illinois in line with federal law, requiring a current medical certificate before a license is issued. Our trucking accident attorneys are pleased to see this important safety improvement.

• Financial Exploitation of Elders: Our Chicago elder abuse attorneys are pleased to report that HB 1689/PA 97-0482 makes the laws against financial exploitation of Illinois elders, and disabled persons, stricter, by lowering the financial value which will result in felony charges.

• Railroad First Aid Kits: HB 1573/PA 97-0374) requires all railroads to have first aid kits on hand when employees are on board, in the event of a train accident or other mishap.

• SIDS Training: HB 2099/PA 97-0083 mandates that all licensed child care facilities who care for infants and newborns must complete training, every 3 years, on SIDS, safe sleep, and SUID.

• Nursing Home Infectious Disease Control: HB 1096/PA 97-0107 puts procedures in place to prevent the spread of infections and disease in nursing homes.

• Medical Malpractice Information: HB 1476/PA 97-0449 provides greater public access to information about pending medical malpractice complaints or reports before the Illinois medical disciplinary board, and increases reporting requirements.

• Hotel Smoke Detectors: HB 1398/PA 97-0447 requires all hotels to place a smoke detector 15 feet or less from every room used for sleeping.

• Synthetic Cannabis: Our products liability attorneys have previously written about the dangers of synthetic cannabis, often marketed as “incense.” HB 2595/PA 97-0193 makes five different generically-defined classes of synthetic cannabinoids controlled substances.

• Truck Weight Restrictions: SB 1644/PA 97-0201 preempts local rules and makes truck weight and size limits entirely a matter of state law. Our trucking accident attorneys are disappointed to see the ability of local governments to keep roads safe from dangerous, oversized trucks removed.

If you have any questions about a serious personal injury or wrongful death matter, please give us a call us at 312-527-4500 or email us at info@passenlaw.com for a complimentary consultation. You can also learn more by following us on Twitter, reviewing our LinkedIn or Avvo.com pages, and by reviewing our website.

share save 171 16 New Laws Take Effect in Illinois

Product Recall Safety Information Not Reaching Consumers

Monday, April 4th, 2011

The products liability attorneys of Passen Law Group often speak out on the frequent failure of various types of companies to provide adequate, timely information to U.S. regulators, and the failure of those regulators to adequately supervise these companies, follow up on the information they receive, and issue prompt, necessary recalls.

But when recalls are issued, they do no good unless the consumers who have purchased the defective or deadly products are aware of the recall.  Now, a new poll by Consumer Reports National Research Center and published in Consumer Reports indicating that, by and large, crucial recall safety information is not reaching the consumers who need to hear it.

Not that consumers aren’t concerned about recalled, potentially dangerous products.  Some segments of the U.S. population, of course, are more concerned than others.  Predictably, parents – particularly the parents of preschoolers and school-aged children – were among those most worried about missing important recall announcements, with 26 percent reporting that they worried about this issue.

But also, surprisingly, the young were more worried about these issues than the old.  More than twenty-five percent of Americans aged eighteen to twenty-four, typically not thought of as the most cautious age range, were concerned about missing recall notices.  But less than seventeen percent of Americans aged sixty-five or older shared these concerns. Our Chicago personal injury lawyers were surprised to see such a low level of concern among our nation’s seniors.

There were also varying levels of concern depending on the type or products involved. The poll found that consumers were generally quite concerned that parents receive adequate notice of recalls to children’s products, regardless of the type.  But when it came to products designed for adults, most Americans were highly concerned that consumers receive information about food and medicine recalls, but less concerned about recalls of other products, like clothing and sporting goods.

But this consumer concern simply did not translate into the receipt of accurate information by the American public. In spite of the literally tens of millions of products recalled over the past three years, the poll found that only around twenty percent of Americans were aware of having purchased a recalled product (excluding cars) in that time frame.

And of those twenty percent who were aware of having purchased a recalled product, the types of products involved were quite limited.  As our products liability attorneys are only too well aware, recalled products span all types of products, from cribs to window blinds, from sweatshirts to sporting goods, from drinking glasses to sunglasses.  Yet almost 40 percent of those aware of purchasing a recalled product were only aware of having purchased recalled food, and another close to forty percent were only aware of having purchased recalled medication.

Moreover, our nation’s consumers are overly dependent upon the whims of our nation’s journalists to keep them informed of recalls.  A majority of those who learned that they had purchased a recalled medication or product, and almost two-thirds of those who learned that they had purchased recalled food, learned about the recall from the news. By contrast, only one-sixth learned about a recalled product from the product’s manufacturer.

While we are pleased that so many Americans are learning about dangerous products from news reports. But our experienced products liability attorneys are highly concerned about what this source of information leaves out.  Product recalls in one form or another are generally issued several times a week, sometimes on a nearly daily basis, and the vast majority of these recalls are not sensational enough to receive news coverage. Consumers who have purchased these products are thus left unprotected.

Our nation simply cannot rely upon this spotty and inconsistent method for keeping consumers informed of the dangerous products in their homes, garages, medicine cabinets and refrigerators. While the attorneys of Passen Law Group are pleased with recent advances in this area, such as CPSC email alerts, clearly enough has not yet been done.  The CPSC, together with manufacturers, must develop better procedures and practices for ensuring that consumers are aware of dangerous, recalled products.

For a Free Consultation with a top-rated Chicago product injury lawyer at Passen Law Group, call us at (312) 527-4500.

share save 171 16 Product Recall Safety Information Not Reaching Consumers

Study Finds Alcohol is Deadliest Drug

Tuesday, November 16th, 2010

When many people think of deadly recreational drugs, what most often comes to mind are things like heroin, crack cocaine, and methamphetamines.  But is something we encounter every day – alcohol – actually more deadly than these frightening substances?

Our Chicago accident lawyers have long suspected that the answer is “yes.”  Now, researchers in Britain have come to this same conclusion.  A new study published last week in the online version of the medical journal Lancet looked at just this question.  This research was funded by Britain’s Centre for Crime and Justice Studies.

The British researchers evaluated various “recreational” drugs, both legal and illegal, including alcohol as well as marijuana, cocaine (and crack cocaine), heroin, methamphetamines (commonly called “crystal meth”) and ecstasy.  For each drug, they looked at a number of factors, focused both on the drug’s impact on the individuals who take it and the drug’s larger impact on society more generally.  These factors included addictiveness, the effects on and harms to the human body, environmental damage, consequences to families, healthcare costs, social services costs to society, and the economic costs to society from imprisoning users, dealers, and others.

The researchers then ranked the drugs in a number of ways.  They looked at individual destructiveness, as well as detriment to society. The results were as follows:

  • When the effects on individual users alone were considered, the most lethal drugs were heroin, crack cocaine and crystal meth.
  • When only the dangers to larger society were considered, alcohol, heroin and crack cocaine were the most lethal.
  • When both factors (individual and societal damage) were considered, alcohol was the deadliest of all the drugs.

To the injury and wrongful death attorneys of Passen Law Group, these results were not very surprising.  Considering the widespread use and acceptance of alcohol – setting it apart from all the other drugs studied – it is natural that the societal costs of alcohol use are high.  Moreover, as we have seen firsthand, there are countless deadly car accidents caused by drunk drivers, and other serious accidents where alcohol is involved.

Take, for instance, the senseless death this weekend in Bolingbrook, Illinois, where a suspected drunk teenage driver drove her car through a residential building and killed a woman who was sleeping in her bed.

So what can be done?  Obviously, there are no easy answers.  The study mentions several ways to address the problem, including governments focusing their attention on “problem drinkers” or increasing the price of alcohol.  Whatever solutions are eventually agreed upon, our wrongful death attorneys are glad to see a study bringing attention to this very real problem.  We have seen far too many lives lost and destroyed by alcohol, through drunk driving and other issues, to take this problem lightly.

For a free consultation with an experienced Chicago personal injury lawyer at Passen Law Group, call us at (312) 527-4500.

share save 171 16 Study Finds Alcohol is Deadliest Drug