Posts Tagged ‘Personal Injury Lawyer’

Congress Works to Increase Food Safety

Tuesday, December 21st, 2010

With the rash of recalls in recent years:  eggs, peanut butter, even spinach, it is difficult to feel confident in our nation’s food supply.  Our top Chicago injury attorneys understand that under the current food safety regime, there is good reason to be nervous.  And although lawsuits are a useful and valid tool after an outbreak has occurred, there is no substitute for preventing food-contamination outbreaks in the first place.  Unfortunately, while America once made great strides in constantly increasing food safety, that trend has ceased and even reversed in the past decade.

Much of the problem lies with the lack of true regulatory oversight.  The various component parts involved in overseeing and maintaining food safety are split between a large number of different federal departments and regulatory agencies.  And the FDA has chosen to focus almost entirely on overseeing the safety of medicines and medical devices – a highly important task – to such an extent that many in our society and government have forgotten that the “F” in “FDA” stands for food.

But as this legislative session draws to a close, Democrats and Republicans have come together in a rare show of bipartisanship to pass important legislation that will enhance our nation’s food safety and supply.

The status of the legislation is still unclear, as the House and Senate have passed slightly different versions of the legislation that have not yet been reconciled.  However, due to the extensive similarities between the House and Senate versions, the strong bipartisan support the legislation enjoys, and the backing of President Obama, our products liability lawyers believe that it is only a matter of time until the bill becomes law.

Unfortunately, this bill will do nothing to consolidate the scattered food safety functions into a single federal department or agency.  Still, the bill is a giant step forward.  The primary strength of the bill is the new strength it grants to the FDA – increasing the number of inspections the FDA must conduct, and providing the funding to make those inspections a reality. The FDA would also be given the authority, for the first time, to oversee farming, and to demand instead of request recalls of tainted products.

The legislation also addresses the rapidly-growing problem of the safety of food imports.  Although we often think of food as being domestically grown and produced, the truth is that a shocking proportion of the foods Americans eat originates overseas.  Around twenty percent of our nation’s food, and over thirty percent of its seafood, is imported.  And while the manufacture and growth of foodstuffs is often far less regulated overseas, imported food receives very little inspection under current law.

Indeed, the FDA currently conducts an inspection of less than one pound of food for each million pounds that are imported.  With that rate of review, it is surprising that even more food problems have not occurred.

The new legislation would significantly improve the oversight of imported food.  Not only would inspections of imported food increase, but the legislation would also give the FDA the power to inspect foreign processing plants themselves.  And, perhaps most importantly, it would allow the FDA to set standards for how food must be grown and processed if it is to be imported into the United States.

No one, including the experienced products liability lawyers of Passen Law Group, believes that the new food safety legislation will single-handedly fix the nation’s food safety problems.  Even after this legislation takes effect, there will still be outbreaks and recalls such as we have seen in recent years.  But there will be fewer outbreaks, fewer recalls, and fewer deaths.

Although he may be overconfident in the power of legislation, perhaps Senator Tom Harkin, (D) Iowa, the chairman of the Senate’s health committee and a key supporter of this legislation, put it best:  “This legislation means that parents who tell their kids to eat their spinach can be assured that it won’t make them sick.”

For a free consultation with an experienced Chicago products liability lawyer at Passen Law Group, call us at (312) 527-4500.

share save 171 16 Congress Works to Increase Food Safety

Defensive Cycling Can Prevent Accidents With Negligent Drivers

Tuesday, August 31st, 2010

Chicago bicycle accident lawyer 300x200 Defensive Cycling Can Prevent Accidents With Negligent DriversExperts believe that the interactions between cars and bicycles are continually improving in the Chicago area.  This is partly due to the construction of many new bike lanes around the city.  It is also due to the fact that most Chicago bicyclists are also motorists, and vice versa.  This gives each an understanding of the risks facing the other, and improves safety for all.

While our Chicago personal injury attorneys are pleased to hear that the situation may be improving, we urge cyclists to avoid complacency.  Many motorists are still stubbornly unaware of the bicycles around them.  This negligence can lead to accidents, injury and death for bicyclists.

Crashes involving cars and bicycles are still surprisingly common in Chicago.  In fact, in 2008 alone (the most recent year for which complete data is available), there were 1,494 such crashes.  During that same period nationwide, accidents between cars and bicycles killed over 700 people and injured another 52,000.

That’s why defensive bicycling is so important.  Our Chicago personal injury attorneys would love to see more bicyclists taking the steps that can protect them from the common, but inexcusable, negligence of motorists.  This begins with always wearing a helmet – the single most important thing any bicyclist can do to prevent injury and death.  In addition, bicyclists should always ride on the road, not the sidewalk, and ride with traffic, not against.  In addition, there are a number of common accident scenarios that cyclists can take steps to prevent.

Avoiding cars entering the roadway from the right is a simple but essential safety precaution.  In fact, the single most common accident involving bicyclists is one where the cyclist is struck by a car pulling out of a driveway, alley, or side street on the right-hand side of the road.  This is often because cyclists tend to ride as far to the right as possible, to avoid traffic on the road.  Unfortunately, this makes it more difficult for cars entering the roadway from the right to see the cyclist.  Bicyclists must thus remain aware, slowing down if they see cars entering the roadway, using lights or horns, and making eye contact with these drivers whenever possible.

Another peril of biking as far to the right as possible is parked cars on the right hand side of the road.  It is surprisingly common for bicyclists to be struck by car doors opening into their pathway.  Again, awareness and avoiding biking on the far right of the lane can help prevent these accidents and resulting injuries.  Of course, motorists could prevent these accidents by the simple expedient of checking for upcoming bicyclists before opening their doors.  However, our Chicago accident attorneys have learned that you cannot expect others not to be negligent:  you must take whatever steps possible to ensure your own safety.

Biking to the right of cars can also be dangerous in many ways.  Bicyclists should never pass a car on the right, as drivers tend to be unaware that a biker is approaching on that side.  Bicyclists should also never stop to the right of a car at a red light:  drivers are again often unaware of their presence, and can strike them by turning right when the light turns green.  Instead, bikers at red lights should stop in the middle of the lane.

Finally, bikers must bike defensively to avoid being hit from behind.  When biking at night, cyclist should be sure to have a rear-facing light, or at minimum a reflector facing the rear.  Bikers should also check behind them carefully before merging left out of a parking lane, bike lane, or right-hand lane.

For a free consultation with an experienced Chicago personal injury lawyer at Passen Law Group, call us at (312) 527-4500.

share save 171 16 Defensive Cycling Can Prevent Accidents With Negligent Drivers

Red-Light Cameras Do Not Make Intersections Safer

Monday, July 5th, 2010

Chicago intersection camera 262x300 Red Light Cameras Do Not Make Intersections SaferCook County recently announced plans to install twenty new red-light cameras throughout the Chicago suburbs, in what the County Board describes as a one-year pilot program.  The suburbs targeted to receive these new cameras, however, are protesting and considering legal action.  Our Chicago car accident lawyers believe this chain of events engenders many questions:  Why is the County doing this?  Why are the suburbs protesting?  And does all of this really make Chicago-area drivers any safer?

We have been following this story with great interest.  Although red-light cameras are increasingly popular with various levels of government, the most recent data shows that they do not make intersections safer.  Indeed, it now appears that the opposite may be true.  So why install more?  The answer is simple:  the almighty dollar.

The University of Illinois at Chicago recently performed a comprehensive analysis of accidents at Chicago intersections, including the 188 Chicago intersections with red-light cameras.  The study was based on data from the Illinois Department of transportation, and was performed by comparing accident data from the year before the Chicago red-light cameras were installed, and the year after.

What the UIC researchers found will not shock intelligent observers, but is certainly shocking in light of Cook County’s hunger for more cameras:  although accidents in the Chicago area decreased overall, there has been no decrease in car accidents at intersections with red-light cameras.  Indeed, at area intersections where a red-light camera was installed, accidents have actually increased by five percent.  UIC Assistant Professor Rajiv Shah, discussing the study, summed up the importance of the data.  “The clearest thing is the red light cameras have not changed driving behavior in any significant pattern.”

So, why the continued interest in red-light cameras?  Chicago-area governments would have you believe that they are only concerned with your safety. Even after the UIC study was made public, the Chicago Department of Transportation continued to insist that red-light cameras increase public safety.  The CDOT has publicly stated that the UIC study was flawed, because it included data on accidents that occurred up to 250 feet from the center of the intersection.  The CDOT states that it is conducting its own analysis, using a much more limited definition of an “intersection,” and that its “preliminary analysis” shows a twenty percent reduction in crashes at intersections with cameras.  That must be a narrow definition indeed.

So why does Cook County want to install new cameras?  Anyone who has been following the County’s recent budget woes should easily answer that question.  Our Chicago personal injury attorneys know that red-light cameras mean big bucks for those who install them, plain and simple.  If you think that this is an overly cynical view, consider the following:  the county has already budgeted for a minimum of $2 million in revenue from the twenty proposed cameras.  And the City of Chicago collected around $109 million from red-light camera revenues between 2003, when it began installing the cameras, through 2008 – with about $44 million of that coming in 2008 alone.

The greed associated with these cameras is not limited to the County Board.  FOX Chicago News reported early in 2010 that yellow lights at Chicago intersections with red-light cameras (installed by the City) had been set shorter – and even failed to meet the federally-required minimum of three seconds in length.  You don’t need a traffic expert to tell you that shortening the length of a yellow light is not a move designed to increase safety.  This action is designed to catch more drivers, and increase the revenue from red-light cameras.

It remains to be seen whether the Chicago suburbs will be successful in their fight to keep the Cook County Board from installing red-light cameras within suburban municipalities.  But our Chicago car crash lawyers believe that such cameras will be installed in any event.  What the current fight will determine is who will install them, and thus who will receive the revenue.

While suburban residents may believe that their municipal governments are fighting to keep such cameras out, the fact remains that none of these governments have stated a blanket opposition to red-light cameras, or even championed the UIC’s safety data.  Instead, they have simply insisted that the County Board does not have the authority to install the cameras, because the municipalities police the roads.  If they win that battle, expect to see the suburbs themselves install cameras in the near future.

After all, red-light cameras are now big business.

For a free consultation with an experienced Chicago personal injury lawyer at Passen Law Group, call us at (312) 527-4500.

share save 171 16 Red Light Cameras Do Not Make Intersections Safer