Posts Tagged ‘Personal Injury Lawyer’

Personal Injury Litigation Needed to Force Automobile Safety

Thursday, June 3rd, 2010

Customers and citizens throughout the United States are in an uproar over the latest revelations about the abhorrent conduct of Toyota motor company.  First, we learned that Toyota waited at least four months, after learning that its accelerators could become stuck, before informing U.S. authorities.  Then, it came to light that Toyota waited at least a year, after learning of a dangerous defect in SUV and pickup steering systems which can can cause drivers to lose control of the vehicle, before informing U.S. authorities and issuing a recall.  Thus, the purpose of personal injury litigation.

Although customers are currently outraged at Toyota for its conduct, the simple truth is that Toyota’s actions are part of a larger pattern.  Again and again, automakers (and other companies) absolutely refuse to consider the safety of customers and the public.  Only when civil litigation – including both compensatory and punitive damages – force these companies into action will they correct dangerous designs or defects, or put in place basic safety precautions.  That’s why top Chicago personal injury attorneys and products liability lawyers like those at Passen Law Group are so important.  Without lawsuits, these dangerous products, whether automobiles, drugs, or others, would be allowed to remain on the market.

Another prime example is unsafe power windows.  So-called “rocker” switches, or push-down switches, which caused windows to close when the button was pressed, were exceedingly dangerous to children.  That’s why foreign governments had rules governing power windows and prohibiting the use of such switches.  The U.S. government, however, had no such rule or regulation.  This was true even though the problem was well known:  for instance, in three months in 2004, power windows caused the deaths of at least seven children.

Yet automakers continued to use these dangerous switches on power windows in U.S. cars, even though they used safer options for their foreign versions of the same vehicles.  It was not until product liability litigation made the automakers pay that they chose to install safe power windows here in the U.S., as well.

This same story played out in yet another context in the “illusory park” transmissions of Chrysler,   Dodge, and Ford vehicles produced throughout the 70s, 80s, and 90s.  This known defect caused drivers to think that they had secured their vehicle when, in fact, the car’s transmission did not recognize that it was in “park.”  Over the course of years, this transmission defect caused at least 90 known injuries and deaths.

This included one well-known incident where a mother, pregnant with twins, placed her Dodge minivan in “park” with her four-year-old daughter inside.  When the vehicle began to roll away, the mother attempted to stop it.  She was crushed and killed in the attempt.

When litigation was brought, the lawyers uncovered the sad, yet predictable truth:  Ford engineers had been aware of the defect since at least 1971, but had done nothing.  Only after losing two civil lawsuits did the company finally correct the defective design.

This repeating pattern of misconduct by automakers (although certainly not unique to the auto industry) illustrates why the U.S. justice system is so important.  Only when those who suffer injuries come forward and make these companies pay are they willing to do the right thing.  If you or someone you love has been injured or killed and you suspect that a design defect may be to blame, our Chicago wrongful death lawyers can help you to investigate the circumstances of your injury, and decide whether to file a civil action.  Your courage may be all that stands between the next customer and injury or death.

For a free consultation with an experienced Chicago car accident attorney at Passen Law Group, call us at (312) 527-4500.

share save 171 16 Personal Injury Litigation Needed to Force Automobile Safety

Medical Malpractice Tort Reform: Setting the Record Straight

Monday, May 24th, 2010

Medical malpractice lawsuits enable patients, and their families, who have been suffered significant, permanent injuries or death as a result of preventable medical errors, to receive compensation.  In 2008, more than 80 percent of malpractice payments went to victims who sustained quadriplegia, brain damage or death.  Passen Law Group’s top-rated Chicago medical malpractice lawyers are fighting to preserve the right of patients to access the civil justice system.

Unfortunately, as we saw during the federal health care reform debates, the powerful insurance lobby has pressed for medical liability “tort reform” — in other words, taking away the right to have a jury award compensation to malpractice victims.  Thankfully, organizations like Public Citizen, a nonprofit consumer advocacy organization, has been combating these scare tactics with actual facts.

The organization recently published a Fact Sheet regarding medical malpractice, and the impact of tort reform:

  • In 2009, a study by Hearst newspapers found that approximately 200,000 Americans die each year from preventable medical errors and hospital acquired infections
  • In 1999, the Institute of Medicine estimated that medical malpractice cost $17 billion to $29 billion annually for lost income, lost household production, disability and health care costs
  • Medical liability tort reform failed in Texas.  Since enacting in 2003: cost of diagnostic testing grown 50 percent faster than national average; cost of health insurance has more than doubled; growth of doctors per capita has slowed
  • Medical malpractice lawsuits are rare:  2008 saw the fewest number of medical malpractice payments since 1990.

Fortunately, medical liability “reform” was not implemented in this year’s federal health care reform law.  Not that this will stop the insurance lobbyists from continuing to push individual states to adopt such reform, or to attempt to re-introduce such measures at the federal level in coming years.

Each Chicago medical malpractice attorney at Passen Law Group understands the devastating impact medical negligence can have on the individual patient, and their families.  We believe malpractice litigation serves as a strong deterrent to the medical profession — to place patient safety at utmost importance — and to implement safe practices in their profession.  We will continue to fight against any efforts to “reform” the way patients seek justice for their injuries.

For a free consultation with a Chicago personal injury lawyer with Passen Law Group, call us at (312) 527-4500.

share save 171 16 Medical Malpractice Tort Reform: Setting the Record Straight

Hospitals Increasingly Fail to Report Medical Malpractice to National Data Bank

Friday, May 7th, 2010

The Chicago medical malpractice attorneys at Passen Law Group understand that hospitals work hard to protect their reputation in their community and their bottom lines.  However, when that effort comes at the expense of the public health and safety of patients, something is wrong.

Twenty-four years ago, Congress became concerned that unethical or substandard doctors could avoid the consequences of their actions by simply changing hospitals or, if the situation were particularly bad, by moving out of state.  Enter the National Practitioner Data Bank.  Congress established the National Practitioner Data Bank to combat this risk, requiring that hospitals who discipline doctors – whether for ethical violations or more straightforward errors and medical malpractice – are required to report this discipline to the Data Bank.  Thus, potential future employers, including medical organizations, practices, and hospitals, can check a doctor’s disciplinary history before hiring, without having to undergo the cumbersome and prohibitive exercise of attempting to check with the boards of all 50 states.

Our medical malpractice attorneys support the National Practitioner Data Bank and other commonsense, straightforward laws that can help to promote safe medical practices performed by competent physicians.  However, a study by nonprofit consumer group Public Citizen, titled “Hospitals Drop the Ball on Physician Oversight,” suggests that the Data Bank is not functioning as an effective tool for preventing malpractice, for the simple reason that the law requiring reporting is regularly violated by U.S. hospitals.

For example, from 1990 to 2007, nearly half of U.S. hospitals did not make even one report to the Data Bank.  In some states, this rate is even more extreme.  In Ohio, for instance, fewer than 43% of hospitals have ever reported even a single instance of discipline to the Data Bank.

While we would like to believe that the quality of care in the U.S. is so high that half of the hospitals had no need to discipline even a single physician, our experience tells us otherwise.  The only explanation for this report rate is that hospitals are not reporting their disciplinary measures as required.

For those who are not convinced, there is hard data.  Over one three-year period, about 8,000 physicians were disciplined by state medical boards in the U.S.  Over that same period, however, only about 3,000 reports were made to the National Practitioner Data Bank.

Indeed, Public Citizen’s report shows that hospitals are taking steps specifically targeted to avoid the law.  As an example, hospitals are required to report to the Data Bank any suspension of a physician for longer than 30 days.  So, many hospitals have stopped suspending doctors for this long, choosing instead to discipline physicians with shorter suspensions, a leave of absence, educational requirements, or some combination of these measures.  No 30-day suspension means no report required:  the physician is protected, and her future patients are not.

At other times, hospitals do not even bother to skirt the law, but simply ignore it.  Public Citizen’s report identifies at least one instance (at a hospital in California) where a group of physicians who performed numerous unnecessary surgeries was not reported because of the prestige of one of the physicians and the funds those surgeries generate for the hospital.

It is small wonder that hospitals have not complied with the law.  As of a few years ago, there had not been a single action taken, against any hospital, for failure to follow the law.  Hospitals are not ignorant of the fact that there have been no consequences for noncompliance.  As experienced medical negligence lawyers are well aware, without the realistic threat of punishment, through law enforcement or the courts, doctors and hospitals will do no more than is absolutely necessary to protect their patients.  That is why literally tens of thousands of people die each year in the U.S. from preventable medical errors in hospitals.

This situation is obviously untenable.  Doctors and hospitals cannot be permitted to simply ignore laws that are meant to protect the public.  The lawyers of Passen Law Group add our voices to those demanding that these laws be enforced, and that hospitals be required to place protecting the innocent above protecting unethical or incompetent physicians, and their own bottom lines.

For a free consultation with an experienced Chicago personal injury lawyer at Passen Law Group, call us at (312) 527-4500.

share save 171 16 Hospitals Increasingly Fail to Report Medical Malpractice to National Data Bank