Posts Tagged ‘Product Liability’

Congress Works to Increase Food Safety

Tuesday, December 21st, 2010

With the rash of recalls in recent years:  eggs, peanut butter, even spinach, it is difficult to feel confident in our nation’s food supply.  Our top Chicago injury attorneys understand that under the current food safety regime, there is good reason to be nervous.  And although lawsuits are a useful and valid tool after an outbreak has occurred, there is no substitute for preventing food-contamination outbreaks in the first place.  Unfortunately, while America once made great strides in constantly increasing food safety, that trend has ceased and even reversed in the past decade.

Much of the problem lies with the lack of true regulatory oversight.  The various component parts involved in overseeing and maintaining food safety are split between a large number of different federal departments and regulatory agencies.  And the FDA has chosen to focus almost entirely on overseeing the safety of medicines and medical devices – a highly important task – to such an extent that many in our society and government have forgotten that the “F” in “FDA” stands for food.

But as this legislative session draws to a close, Democrats and Republicans have come together in a rare show of bipartisanship to pass important legislation that will enhance our nation’s food safety and supply.

The status of the legislation is still unclear, as the House and Senate have passed slightly different versions of the legislation that have not yet been reconciled.  However, due to the extensive similarities between the House and Senate versions, the strong bipartisan support the legislation enjoys, and the backing of President Obama, our products liability lawyers believe that it is only a matter of time until the bill becomes law.

Unfortunately, this bill will do nothing to consolidate the scattered food safety functions into a single federal department or agency.  Still, the bill is a giant step forward.  The primary strength of the bill is the new strength it grants to the FDA – increasing the number of inspections the FDA must conduct, and providing the funding to make those inspections a reality. The FDA would also be given the authority, for the first time, to oversee farming, and to demand instead of request recalls of tainted products.

The legislation also addresses the rapidly-growing problem of the safety of food imports.  Although we often think of food as being domestically grown and produced, the truth is that a shocking proportion of the foods Americans eat originates overseas.  Around twenty percent of our nation’s food, and over thirty percent of its seafood, is imported.  And while the manufacture and growth of foodstuffs is often far less regulated overseas, imported food receives very little inspection under current law.

Indeed, the FDA currently conducts an inspection of less than one pound of food for each million pounds that are imported.  With that rate of review, it is surprising that even more food problems have not occurred.

The new legislation would significantly improve the oversight of imported food.  Not only would inspections of imported food increase, but the legislation would also give the FDA the power to inspect foreign processing plants themselves.  And, perhaps most importantly, it would allow the FDA to set standards for how food must be grown and processed if it is to be imported into the United States.

No one, including the experienced products liability lawyers of Passen Law Group, believes that the new food safety legislation will single-handedly fix the nation’s food safety problems.  Even after this legislation takes effect, there will still be outbreaks and recalls such as we have seen in recent years.  But there will be fewer outbreaks, fewer recalls, and fewer deaths.

Although he may be overconfident in the power of legislation, perhaps Senator Tom Harkin, (D) Iowa, the chairman of the Senate’s health committee and a key supporter of this legislation, put it best:  “This legislation means that parents who tell their kids to eat their spinach can be assured that it won’t make them sick.”

For a free consultation with an experienced Chicago products liability lawyer at Passen Law Group, call us at (312) 527-4500.

share save 171 16 Congress Works to Increase Food Safety

Companies Ask Congress to Put Profits Before Child Safety

Monday, December 20th, 2010

It is not often that individuals or businesses have the gall to ask our government to rollback or repeal legislation that cut children’s deaths in half.  But that is exactly what is currently going on in Congress, as legislators consider requests from toymakers and retailers to undo key legislation regarding lead and other toxic substances in children’s products.

The requirements at issue are a part of the Consumer Product Safety Improvement Act of 2008.  In 2008, prior to the enactment of the CPSIA, there were 172 recalls of children’s products due to the presence of lead and other toxic substances.  That same year, there were 24 related children’s deaths.  Then came the CPSIA.  In 2009, under the new law, the number of recalls was cut by two-thirds, to 50, and the number of deaths was cut in half:  only 12 children died.  Our Chicago child injury attorneys believe that the death of even one infant or child is too many.  But it is hard to argue with reforms that get such stunning results.

At least, we thought it was.

However, in the cold light of 2010, the effort has been launched to undo this important reform.  Why? Because the law’s requirements are supposedly too hard on business.  Indeed, those who advocate rolling back or repealing the CPSIA argue that if these child-safety measures are allowed to continue, small businesses will shut down.

So just what are the onerous requirements of the CPSIA?  Simply this:  The law establishes the ceiling on permissible amounts of lead in children’s products.  Every product marketed to children under 12 years of age must be tested to ensure that it does not contain lead above that level.  That test must be documented.  This includes all products marketed to this age range:  clothes, toys, sports gear, even children’s furniture.

These requirements seem eminently reasonable to the injury and wrongful death lawyers of Passen Law Group.  Even if they were marginally burdensome, that burden would surely be justified to ensure the safety of our children.

Yet even this is too much for the business community.  Even now, lobbying is underway to exempt huge categories of products – everything from bikes, to all sporting goods, to anything handmade – from CPSIA compliance.  Although various rationales are given, the fact remains: anything a child regularly plays with or is in contact with can be a danger if lead levels are too high, regardless of how it was made, where it comes from, or what type of product it is.  Our Chicago product liability attorneys vehemently oppose these efforts to weaken the protection that the CPSIA affords our children.

Unfortunately, even with the current CPSIA, children still are not safe from lead-tainted toys and products.  That’s why we at Passen Law Group support those who are striving not to weaken the CPSIA, but to enhance it.  Courageous legislators such as Senator Mark Pryor, (D)Arkansas, are leading the efforts to set even stricter ceilings for the amount of lead permitted in children’s products.  Moreover, Senator Pryor and his colleagues want to strengthen the force of the law by requiring that third parties perform  the lead testing and documentation, rather than allowing this task to be completed by the manufacturers and retailers themselves.

Although this measure is opposed by lobbyists and others representing the toy industry, the lives it could save are reason enough to support it.  Until the number of children’s deaths is reduced to zero, we simply must take every measure possible to force those who peddle goods to our children to actually ensure that those goods are safe.  This includes strengthening the CPSIA, and enforcing it through regulatory action and through lawsuits against those businesses who do not comply.  Only then will we see action by the manufacturers to truly make our children’s products safe.

If a child you love has been diagnosed with lead poisoning, we urge you to investigate and determine which products were responsible for the harm she has suffered.  An experienced personal injury attorney can help you with that investigation, and assist you in determining if you might have a claim against the manufacturers and retailers of the product that hurt your child.

For a free consultation with an experienced Chicago injury lawyer at Passen Law Group, call us at (312) 527-4500.

share save 171 16 Companies Ask Congress to Put Profits Before Child Safety

Toyota Does It Again

Monday, November 8th, 2010

Our Chicago wrongful death attorneys have come to expect the corporations of the world to engage in delay and spin, while gambling with the lives of consumers (aka, the public).  Thus it comes as no surprise to learn of continuing revelations from Toyota Motor Corporation, which demonstrate just how much the company is willing to do to protect its bottom line.

Just today, a wrongful death lawsuit against Toyota was filed claiming that a defective keyless ignition system in a luxury Lexus vehicle caused the carbon monoxide poisoning death of a 79-year-old New York lawyer.

Last week, Toyota announced yet another recall – this time the recall of around 1.5 million vehicles, both Lexus and Toyota models.  The recall was prompted by brake-fluid and fuel-pump problems.  The vehicles involved range from the 2004 to 2006 model years.  Although there have not yet been any injuries or deaths associated with these problems, it seems that it is only luck that has kept it that way.  The brake-fluid problem can lead to “spongy” brakes and eventual brake failure, while the fuel-pump issue can cause engine stalls.  Either of these problems could easily lead to motor vehicle accidents or wrongful death.

This is only the latest in a frightening string of recalls by Toyota – all within the past year.  The first and best known of these recalls involved a a series of vehicles whose accelerators could become stuck.  The next Toyota recall involved Toyota SUVs and pickups whose steering systems can break, causing drivers to lose control of the vehicles. Then, in July, the third recent Toyota recall hit.  In that recall, Toyota recalled about 270,000 Lexus and other luxury vehicles with potentially defective valve springs, which can cause engine failure.

Toyota waited at least four months, after learning of the phenomenally dangerous accelerator defect, before informing U.S. authorities.   As to the steering system defect in SUVs and pickups, the public later learned that Toyota waited at least a year before learning of the defects before it informed U.S. authorities. And with the recall of the luxury vehicles, Toyota waited an astounding three years between learning of the defect and informing U.S. authorities.

Now, it seems that the problems run even deeper.  Our Chicago personal injury lawyers have learned that this time, Toyota waited five years – yes, five years – between first learning of the brake-fluid problems and issuing last week’s recall.  The first reports of the problem began to reach Toyota in 2005, yet it is only now, near the end of 2010, that the company has deigned to share this information with the U.S. authorities and the public.

Shockingly, Toyota has defended this delay, stating that the possible brake failures did not pose “an unreasonable safety risk.”  We are appalled, but not surprised, by this lack of concern for the lives and welfare of customers – and those in the path of their unbrakeable vehicles.

This simply cannot be allowed to continue.  Although Toyota has taken a hit in U.S. sales, and been levied a large fine by U.S. authorities, the company remains the world’s top automaker.  Indeed, although the company’s global sales dropped slightly in the months following the announcement of the first, accelerator-based recall, the company still made over a billion dollars that quarter.  And, in spite of the subsequent recalls, sales rebounded, with the company raking it is usual $2.2 billion in the subsequent quarter – the most recent for which data is yet available.

Simply put, these continuing obscene profits give the automaker no real incentive to take safety seriously.  Until U.S. authorities, U.S. consumers, and, most importantly, U.S. victims truly begin to stand up to this automotive Goliath, nothing will change.  If you or someone you love has been seriously injured or killed by a defective Toyota vehicle, we urge you to come forward, and to take action against the company.  Perhaps this is the only way to send the message that this will not be tolerated, and that the company will be made to pay for its disregard of our lives.

For a free consultation with an experienced Chicago product liability lawyer at Passen Law Group, call us at (312) 527-4500.

share save 171 16 Toyota Does It Again