Posts Tagged ‘Tort Reform’

Tort Reform Properlty Remains Out of Health Care Bills

Wednesday, February 24th, 2010

As President Obama and fellow democrats went back to the drawing board once again concerning health care reform, conservatives representing the insurance lobby raised calls for tort reform.  Fortunately for the hundreds of thousands of Americans seriously injured or killed each year by preventable medical errors, our Chicago medical malpractice attorneys are pleased to report that the President, and the Congressional majority, has not backed down from its stance that damage caps in medical malpractice cases have no place in health care reform legislation.

Proponents of tort reform say it will result in huge savings over the long haul. The Congressional Budget Office (CBO), that black hole of information, says savings from tort reform can be anywhere from $41 billion to $54 billion over a ten-year period.  Our Chicago medical malpractice lawyers note that this savings amounts to less than one percent of health care costs, at a time when overall health care costs are expected to increase by $2 trillion (with a “T”) in that same ten-year period.

So, tort reform may save Americans less than 1 percent of health care costs over a 10-year period.  But at what cost?  If doctors and medical providers have capped professional liability exposure, will that reduce the incentive to practice safer medicine?  How many more Americans will die or sustain catastrophic injuries caused by medical negligence as a result of capping liability exposure?  What is the cost in terms of damage to families whose lives have been ruined by preventable medical errors, who will not have the financial means to provide for themselves?

The CBO did not measure this cost.

Tort reform removes the ability for victims of negligence to lead as normal a life as possible while giving insurance companies a free pass to profit off the negligence of doctors, hospitals and other health care professionals.

Each Chicago medical malpractice attorney at Passen Law Group understands the devastating impact that medical malpractice can have on families.  Just as the Illinois Supreme Court recently held that damage caps are unconstitutional, we believe that any similar federal law is also unconstitutional.

There are specific factors that must be met in order to bring a medical malpractice case, and such cases also involve doctors, hospitals and insurance companies. The experienced Chicago injury lawyers of Passen Law have a thorough understanding of the factors, players and statutes of limitation.  We also understand that compensation must cover the costs of living with permanent disability, including past and future medical treatment, lost wages, loss of normal life, disfigurement, and past and future pain and suffering.

For a Free Consultation with a Chicago personal injury lawyer with Passen Law Group, call us at (312) 527-4500.

  • Share/Bookmark

Illinois Supreme Court Strikes Down Damage Caps in Medical Malpractice Cases as Unconstitutional

Thursday, February 4th, 2010

Today, the Illinois Supreme Court held that legislative caps on noneconomic damages in medical malpractice cases violate the separation of powers clause of the Illinois Constitution.  This landmark decision, Lebron v. Gottlieb Memorial Hospital, No. 105741 (Ill. Feb. 4, 2010), comes as a huge relief to Chicago medical malpractice lawyers who represent the interests of those permanently injured or killed every year as a result of preventable medical errors.

The Lebron case was brought on behalf of Abigaile Lebron who allegedly sustained numerous permanent injuries during childbirth at Gottlieb, including “severe brain injury, cerebral palsy, cognitive mental impairment, inability to be fed normally such that she must be fed by a gastronomy tube, and inability to develop normal neurological functioning.”

At issue on appeal was the constitutionality of section 2-1706.5 of the Code of Civil Procedure, which was adopted as part of Public Act 94-677, and which capped the award of noneconomic damages (including pain and suffering, disability, disfigurement, loss of consortium and loss of society)  in medical malpractice actions at $500,000 for a physician and $1,000,000 for a hospital.

The Supreme Court held that the limitation on noneconomic damages in medical malpractice actions set forth in section 2-1706.5 of the Code violates the separation of powers clause of the Illinois Constitution and is invalid.  Further, because Public Act 94-677 contained an inseverability provision, the entire Act is invalid and void in its entirety.

Our Chicago personal injury lawyers believe that all citizens of the United States have a right to a trial by a jury of their peers to decide appropriate compensation in civil actions.  For a free consultation with one of our attorneys, call Passen Law Group at (312) 527-4500.

  • Share/Bookmark

IL Supreme Court Set To Rule on Constitutionality of Damage Caps

Wednesday, February 3rd, 2010

Tomorrow, the Illinois Supreme Court is expected to issue its opinion in Lebron v. Gottlieb Memorial Hospital, a case challenging the constitutionality of damage caps in medical malpractice lawsuits pursuant to the Illinois Medical Malpractice Act of 2005.  Chicago medical malpractice attorneys and both sides of the bar are highly anticipating this opinion.

As noted in one of our earlier blog posts, the Illinois Supreme Court indicated it would release its decision in December, but later decided not to release it on that date.

The challenged statute caps non-liquidated damages (e.g., past/current/future pain and suffering, loss of normal life, disfigurement, loss of society, etc.) in medical negligence actions at $500,000 for doctors and $1 million for hospitals.

As lawyers representing the rights of individuals and families whose lives are often destroyed by medical malpractice, we hope the Supreme Court rules that arbitrary damage caps are unconstitutional.  Indeed, at trial level in Lebron, Cook County Circuit Judge Joan Larsen held that such medical malpractice lawsuit caps are unconstitutional.

Regardless of the outcome, our Chicago personal injury lawyers will continue to fight for the rights of victims who have been permanently injured or killed as a result of the negligence of another.  Call us at (312) 527-4500 for a Free Consultation.

  • Share/Bookmark

Tort Reform is a ‘Distraction’ in Health Care Debate

Thursday, January 28th, 2010

As Congress continues to grapple with health care reform, many conservatives and lobbyists for the insurance industry have called for tort reform as a way to reduce the costs of health care.  However, nearly every independent health economist and legal expert who has studied the issue has found that tort reform would have virtually no impact on health care costs.  These findings come as no surprise to our Chicago wrongful death lawyers, who represent families that have lost their loved ones due to preventable medical errors, and who fight back against the powerful insurance lobby.

A recent article from the Washington Independent notes the “undercurrent” of complaints made by health insurance companies, hospitals and ideological conservatives that medical malpractice claims are out of control and a leading cause of rising health care cost.  Yet, the leading economists and legal experts have found that malpractice liability costs “are a small fraction of the spiraling costs of the U.S. health care system, and that the medical errors that malpractice liability tries to prevent are themselves a huge cost — both to the injured patients and to the health care system as a whole.”

Why, then, do some politicians backed by the insurance lobby claim that medical malpractice lawsuits are out of control and are a main cause of rising health care costs?  “It’s really just a distraction,” says Tom Baker, professor at the University of Pennsylvania Law School and author of “The Medical Malpractice Myth.”  Professor Baker notes that  “if you were to eliminate medical malpractice liability, even forgetting the negative consequences that would have for safety, accountability, and responsiveness, maybe we’d be talking about [a savings of] 1.5 percent of health care costs.  So we’re not talking about real money.”

Another Harvard professor of Law and Public Health, Michelle Mello, agrees.  “If you were to list the top five or ten things that you could do to bring down health care costs, [tort reform] would not be on the list.”

Our Chicago personal injury lawyers are proud to represent individuals and families whose lives have been forever impacted by the negligence or recklessness of others.  Call (312) 527-4500 for a Free Consultation with one of our attorneys.

  • Share/Bookmark